Posted on 11/26/2018 4:23:48 PM PST by rdl6989
Former Trump campaign chairman Paul Manafort lied to the FBI and Special Counsel Robert Mueller's office "on a variety of subject matters" since his plea deal thereby violating the agreement, Mueller said in a court filing submitted Monday night, while adding that Manafort claims he's been truthful.
(Excerpt) Read more at foxnews.com ...
That goes without saying but still doesn’t come close to getting to the crux of my lack of understanding. Why has Mueller chosen to announce this. Did Manafort ever cooperate or did he not and never intend to? And if he never intended to, why enter into a plea agreement.
What I’m saying is a whole lot of it does not make sense and Mueller has a tough road to hoe proving Manafort lies and having to prove it now that he has announced it.
Imagine what POTUS would have done for us had we had given him a Congressional sweep. He would have terminated Malignant Mueller in a New York Minute, along with a lot of other evil doers.
The Republic will not be restored until these creatures are flushed down the drain of history.
bkmk
Mueller has become a national joke.
I think their innocence was always determined but Mueller (along with other FBI agents) simply kept it covered up because they were getting money from Whitey Bulger.
Xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Yup. Muellie’s got to be glad to see he won’t have to worry about whitey (RIP) testifying about the murder for hire mueller allowed bulger to get away with as his CI
When it comes to Muller then only democrats don’t tell lies.
So what did he say?
“My cell is comfortable and the food is good?”
Mueller has to file a report with the judge on a certain schedule, pre-sentencing (which is supposed to be in Feb. 2019). The fact that Mueller and his team of Democrat scumbags claim any “lies” by Manafort should not mean squat, since Mueller’s whole enterprise is steeped in so many lies and frauds. But I’m sure Mueller’s intent is for the judge to take this very seriously and give Manafort the maximum sentence possible. The guy will never see freedom again.... he is 69 yrs old.
He has no legal or moral right to be told the truth about anything.
It's very simple. Manafort went to the Trump Tower meeting. You know, the one with the Russian lawyer, oligarch, translator and others who Glenn Simpson met with the day before and the day after. That was Glenn Simpsons linchpin and it is now Mueller's (they are all on the same team). Manafort supposedly has notes about the meeting that the FBI siezed but they want him to say something else or something more or he said something that wasn't in the notes or something like that.
In short Mueller wants Manafort to lie and say that the meeting was about collusion with Russia to swing the election, maybe asking Russia to release emails they "stole" or something like that. Manafort is probably telling them truthfully that the meeting was a setup and about nothing particularly important.
That's a shame but I don't care. I do care in the sense that Podesta and others need be thrown in jail the rest of their lives if there is any justice. But there is no justice just selective prosecution made as part of a witch hunt. While it's too bad about Manafort, he made that bed mostly himself.
Interesting thoughts, TY.
So - is Mueller really saying that Manafort hasn’t given him Trump’s head on a platter as he hoped he would -
I have no use for Manafort but the double-standards, lies, illegalities, and hypocrisies of Mueller and the Demoncraps are beyond nauseating.
closing in on 4 years of investigation and they have nothing
same FIB that interviews domestic terrorists who’ve made threats, cuts them loose, and then shrugs when they kill in a rampage
Autumn 2015
The conservative website the Washington Free Beacon hires a firm called Fusion GPS to conduct research on several Republican presidential candidates, including Trump.
Late 2015
British intelligence agencies detect suspicious interactions between Russia and Trump aides that they pass on to U.S. intelligence agencies.
I have no idea why these people talk to the FBI at all. What purpose could be served? They are going to charge if they have the goods and not charge if they don’t. And, if there is specific info they want and will give something for it, it can be communicated through an attorney which makes the truth or falsity irrelevant unless the lawyer knows it is false and then it is the lawyer’s problem.
I’d tell them to F off.
It couldn’t be that perhaps Mueller is the one not telling the truth?
.
Your “questions” require baseless presumptions to exist.
.
Correctamundo!
He was unlawfully appointed.
.
How exactly would that jackass know about truth?
Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.