Replies

No, you're right mickety. I didn't catch the date and got all excited thinking this was a fresh story.

But I don't know why you call it Q-bait. It has nothing to do with Q. It has everything to do with an FBI investigation on the Clinton Foundation and the mountains of information, interviews, and the "avalanche of information" that the FBI has collected during that investigation.

This is the line that is most telling, when the FBI source says that indictments are likely "barring some obstruction in some way" from the Justice Department".

So, reading between the lines, I would say we haven't seen indictments because the Justice Department "obstructed them in some way".

Would you agree, mickety?

You seem to not agree with the general facts pointed out in this article. Do you not believe the FBI was conducting the described investigations or that the evidence exists?

Why do you find a way to try to deny EVERYTHING that the Trump administration is ttrying to do. And you wonder why I consider you a decepticon, derp state in disguise? You just seem to playing for the other team all the time.

And explain how this is related to Q in any way. What it proves or disproves about Q. I find it puzzling how you relate all real world goings on to Q, even to the point of obsession and insanity. It's really very cult-like, you ask me.

p.s. Do you think Horowitz/Huber have access to those previous FBI investigations and interviews?

Think real hard. You can do it.