‘Alarming’ Study Claiming Global Warming Heating Up Oceans Based on Math Error

freebeacon.com ^ | Elizabeth Harrington

[Ben Ficklin]

#19 is for you

[wbill]

The actual predicted temperature rise appears to be left out. Convenient. Good propaganda technique.

A temperature change of .016 degree per century, vs .01 degree / century is still a 60% change. But "SIXTY PERCENT" is a far more attention-getting figure....

[EQAndyBuzz]

“So...no fish stew? What do I do with all these oyster crackers?”

Crush them up, take them to a libs house and toss the crackers in the yard. The birds will do the rest.

[mykroar]

Barbie: “Math is hard.”

[mabarker1]

They forgot to install the Fix for Windoze Math Error 25 or whatever years ago.

[aquila48]

“State of Fear” by Crichton is all about that. It exposes the political and money motivations and the tactics behind most causes to “save the planet”.

Well worth a read.

[Crucial]

Is there a list of global warming science fails anywhere?

[aquila48]

Or worse yet imagine measuring the change in ocean levels within millimeters (as they claim to do) with the constant perturbations of changing waves, tides, winds... in all the different locations.

[Mr.Unique]

Somewhere in the world right now there is a climatologist going “ oh crap, i forgot to carry the 3”.

When folks refers to "scientists" in this context, what they really mean is "data scientist".

I was interested enough in the field that I am getting a second Master of Science in Data Science.

[READINABLUESTATE]

Correction= We got caught.

[FreedomPoster]

Please explain how they are measuring subsurface temperatures from space.

[ThePatriotsFlag]

The only way you can PROVE Global Warming is with Mathematics. And the neat thing about math is is cannot be based upon opinion but must be mathematically correct. We are now learning the mathematics DISproves the theory of Global Warming. With the error included, there is global warming for the oceans. Take out the error and there is no global warming of the oceans. These “scientists” are giving us all the proof we need that this is a hoax...mathematics proves it.

[pas]

They would bring in a math expert but the count is busy down in Florida.

[dsrtsage]

Other than the fact that it is physically impossible for the atmosphere to heat the ocean for small reasons like the ocean has over 1000 times the heat capacity of the atmosphere. But also long wave (thermal) radiation does not penetrate the surface of water past a few milimeters. The only way to heat water is with sunlight that penetrates a few hundred feet. The water effects the atmosphere, not vice versa.

[jdsteel]

“State of Fear” by Crichton is all about that. It exposes the political and money motivations and the tactics behind most causes to “save the planet”. Well worth a read.

I agree. And there are some that think it cost him his life.

[Ben Ficklin]

I didn't take you to raise, its not my job to jack around with low information people like you.

I gave you a clue, so go figure it out yourself.

[Chode]

why do i doubt it was a Mistake and not an outright lie

[meadsjn]

So, Bernie Madoff should be able to get off his $50 Billion fraud by claiming a "math error".

The global warming scam is much greater.

[no-s]

If you've been reading the IPCC reports, you'll notice some dubious statistical basis for lots of claims. The reason is there was a rush to publish the summaries so the claims could be touted for the sake of regulation and legislation. For example "likelihood" and "confidence" were often conflated in the earlier summaries. "May occur" was often set at a 50% likelihood and reported with a 50% confidence. I tried going into the 2013/2014 reports the other day (to see if things had improved any) and it was obvious they were trying to hide such errors with lots of weaseling, it gave me a headache and I realized there were better things to do with my life than try to verify models from weaselly summaries.

My takeaway is the IPCC can't be rescued from it's past near-frauds no matter how well-intentioned the participants, because they refuse to identify or acknowledge the consequence of such mistakes while still recommending action based on their "findings".

[hal ogen]

Anti-science losers in pursuit of yet more grant money and trying to impose tyrannical controls through their insane gloBULL warming BS. Liars.