I have no idea what you are trying to say.
The term arises from polling data and interviews. Their views and their behavior puts them into several categories: Women, live in suburbs as defined by Census statistical data, and affluent as defined by certain income and/or net worth categories. It turns out that less affluent suburban women are not infected by this disease. They like Trump.
Don’t take any of this personally, it’s statistics and has nothing to do with you, unless your behavior fits.
“”It turns out that less affluent suburban women are not infected by this disease. They like Trump. Don’t take any of this personally, it’s statistics and has nothing to do with you, unless your behavior fits.””
HA! HA! You can just count me as one of the “less affluent suburban women” and I guess that would go for all (or majority) of my friends also. Little did we know! Now how do my “really affluent” friends who do live in the suburbs explain why they didn’t fall for this? Why they voted for Trump and why they continue to vote Republican? Guess we’ll have to have another poll..
AND NO, I don’t run my life by polls and stats....
“”They live in safe neighborhoods where crime is never a consideration. They probably have never fired a gun, don’t have one in the house, and think guns are for policemen and Neanderthals. They don’t hunt or fish, and think those who do are poorly educated bumpkins””
I don’t think anyone posting here read that article all the way through - it’s filled with more stereotypical garbage than anything that’s come along in a long, long time. And NO, polls and stats are not part of the article - just the twisted thinking of one person who apparently has an axe to grind. The least he could have done was limit it to a certain age group....not someone who was born shortly before WWII!!