Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

To: Dr. Sivana
"Until 1961, 'busses' was the preferred plural of 'bus' in Merriam-Webster dictionaries...."

It ain't 1961 anymore. I don't recall reading it lately with that spelling.

While the story might stir some anger, I have my doubts. This person "hearing" about the buses can see inside the pockets (or socks?) of the illegals where those bills would be safely concealed? Would be a whole lot easier to use dead people or local illegals rather than have them imported I would think? I suppose the voter identification could be forged somehow but requiring them to be on the voter rolls prior to...would put a damper of sorts on the idea?

25 posted on 11/06/2018 9:15:52 AM PST by Sa-teef
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 21 | View Replies ]


To: Sa-teef

It ain’t 1961 anymore. I don’t recall reading it lately with that spelling.

~~~

I kept accidentally typing busses when I was replying to a caravan thread last week and had to correct it multiple times... but I don’t believe I’ve ever used a Merriam-Webster dictionary from 1961, and I’m pretty sure most people would get the idea even if you used for S’s in the word.

Don’t be too quick to start sharing voter-fraud conspiracy stuff on social media today. I know it’s tempting to think you might be on the leading edge of something that might go viral, but I suspect that there are people out there actively floating nutty things just to see who and how bad they can make ‘the other side’ look. They may even be doing metrics and tracking. Or they may not


31 posted on 11/06/2018 9:27:49 AM PST by z3n
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 25 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson