To: Kaslin
If the FBI found his fingerprints on packages, why did it take 2 days to nab him?
3 posted on
10/26/2018 3:18:06 PM PDT by
o-n-money
(We should rename California to Newer Mexico.)
To: o-n-money
"If the FBI found his fingerprints on packages, why did it take 2 days to nab him?" To give the fifth-column leftist media time to get their memes and propaganda prepared.
To: o-n-money
If the FBI found his fingerprints on packages, why did it take 2 days to nab him?
><
They had to make it look good. This guy has been under CIA/Deep State control for some time, IMO. He’s a Dupe.
10 posted on
10/26/2018 3:23:31 PM PDT by
laplata
(The Left/Progressives have diseased minds.)
To: o-n-money
If the FBI found his fingerprints on packages, why did it take 2 days to nab him?He was living in crazed van covered in stickers and didn't have a residence.
To: o-n-money
Because you have to have the evidence to do so....and be particular about it.....as with other arrests when a criminal is on the go as this guy was....
40 posted on
10/26/2018 3:45:08 PM PDT by
caww
To: o-n-money
Sometimes suspects are given time to roam around so that law enforcement can note their contacts.
76 posted on
10/26/2018 4:48:27 PM PDT by
skr
(May God confound the enemy)
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson