Just a slight correction...My understanding is that Fauxahantas did not get “into” Harvard on her “minority” status....but, she did get to TEACH there as a “minority” whom they LAUDED...which IS ridiculous.
What did the largest percentage of her DNA reveal? To manipulate a DNA report for self-serving reasons, seems weird and silly.
You are correct. Thank you.
she did get to TEACH there as a “minority” whom they LAUDED...which IS ridiculous.
The attribution “ of color” to her in the article is the sinker.......
Typical Dem tactic. Caught, then change the topic.
Also deflect from “ cherokee” heritage when the DNA was compared against a South American sample that came from who knows where...