NYT is so objective that they thinking her talking about “the issues” will negate the need to discuss why a country should have as a leader a woman who used significant lies, fraud to advance herself politically and financially at the expense of others.
People in far lesser position who have lied on their resumes have been fired. Maybe the article should investigate how many people Harvard let go or kicked out of school for false claims.
She is a rat 🐀 bastard, and a feckless .... so she gets a pass.