[conservatism_IS_compassion]

I hate sticking up for a leftist, but the guy OBVIOUSLY meant his comment as a sarcastic reference to the Kavanaugh situation and did not seriously mean he was going to throw the woman to the ground and rape her. He recognized this and apologized, and that should have been that. - Pravious

Reading the text isn’t going to tell you that the man in question is not not young, and is not physically intimidating. He was arguing a point (which doesn’t come out in the snippet) and he used words he shouldn’t have.

I have to agree: “snowflake" behavior.

[tuffydoodle]

He IS physically intimidating to that small young woman. I’m small and if he was yelling in my face I would have been very concerned that he would hit me.

[Sgt_Schultze]

“Believe all women”

Alinsky #4. “Make the enemy live up to its own book of rules.” If the rule is that every letter gets a reply, send 30,000 letters. You can kill them with this because no one can possibly obey all of their own rules.

I believe this interviewer was simply implementing this enemy tactic.

[UMCRevMom@aol.com]

Speaking from a woman’s point of view, this reporter has every right to not accept and call out this guy. She is surrounded by angry liberal activists. This man did not just his words, but belittled with his condescending reaching out to her left shoulder chest area. You can hear the kind of gasp just after she told him not to touch her. Even the man in the green shirt was shocked by the older man’s behavior. .

[Stepan12]

He should not be let off the hook. The liub/commies treat all figures of speech as literal speech; e..g.k I'd like to see you attacked by a terrorist and still see you talk like that. They should not get a pass -- especially, since the lib/commies with their antifa and George Soros mercenaries are harassing, vandalizing, and even shooting and skulling the opposition (us).