[wastedyears]

They make it sound as if anybody on the supreme court can say “let me look at this law and see if it’s constitutional.” No, commie, it doesn’t work that way.

[Ohioan]

Roe is but one of a vast array of activist assaults on the Constitution. While any threat to it gets extreme feminists, frothing, it could be rendered ineffective by a simple act of Congress limiting the appellate jurisdiction of the Federal Courts! That is a seldom discussed fact. But there is a vast array of cases, beloved by different factions of the Left, that could be reexamined as "precedents."

What should be looked at in the whole context of the verbal lynching of a good & decent jurist, is this:

What precisely are they seeking, which motivates them to smear Judge Kavanaugh? What is the object of their reprehensible tactics?

Surely the end is even more reprehensible than the loathsome methodology. It is to prevent having a Supreme Court that will actually enforce the Constitutional intent; and by that vehicle, to retain the intention of the Founders, to pass on the Liberty won in the Revolution to succeeding generations.

The loathsome tactics, then, are to allow intellectually corrupted theorists on the Left, to deny Americans their birthright. Loathsome tactics to an even more loathsome purpose.

Our Last Chance? [Can Donald Trump Revive The "Spirit of '76?]

[conservatism_IS_compassion]

The article references Scalia’s dissent in Planned Parenthood v. Casey:

Opinion of Scalia, J. (page 979)

[Kenton]

So... it looks like the DimWits are gonna lose another fight and Kavanaugh is going to win.

Question:

Has anybody heard who is next on Trump's nominee list, if, say, "Sleepyhead" Ruth Ginsburg "goes away", like McCain was so kind as to do?

Sorry, not tired of winning yet, I guess. Actually, I think I'm getting somewhat addicted to it.