I would argue that while the author says “For his part, Kavanaugh said the weeklong National Rape Crisis had nothing to with being white and everything to do with the fact that the Democrats are seeking blood vengeance for his aggressive probing of President Bill Clinton for being a serial perv...” that is actually payback for Garland.
In a way I don’t blame them; if the Democrats had done to a nominee of ours what the we did to Garland I’d be spoiling do to any and everything to derail anyone they sent, period. I think they are much more upset than they have ever been before, or at least in the last 150-200 years; 1820 and 1824 were pretty violent and brutal.
Payback for Garland???
What the heck did anybody “do” to Garland? His honor was not impugned, he was not branded a rapist or sexual abuser, he did not have women and men coming out of the woodwork saying how evil he was, and his reputation was not besmirched.
The only thing that happened with Garland is that nothing happened. Is this worth blood vengeance?