Posted on 09/30/2018 9:45:05 AM PDT by jazusamo
Live in a matriarchy would be hell. Mass hysteria would sweep the matriasphere every few weeks. Wild, preposterous things would be believed by all, and then discarded. Logic and science would be forbidden.
Thank you for posting that.
Unfortunately, many women of my personal acquaintance are non-rational beings who behave exactly as you’ve described.
The government is their husband, father and victim.
Women in the USSR are accorded equal rights with men in all spheres of economic, state, cultural, social and political life. The possibility of exercising these rights is ensured to women by granting them an equal right with men to work, payment for work, rest and leisure, social insurance and education, and by state protection of the interests of mother and child, pre-maternity and maternity leave with full pay, and the provision of a wide network of maternity homes, nurseries and kindergartens.Drag the first world down the the level of the second and all of those special rights disappear.
1936 USSR constitution, Article 122
Women and men have equal rights in the USSR.
Exercise of these rights is ensured by according women equal access with men to education and vocational and professional training, equal opportunities in employment, remuneration, and promotion, and in social and political, and cultural activity, and by special labor and health protection measures for women; by providing conditions enabling mothers to work; by legal protection, and material and moral support for mothers and children, including paid leaves and other benefits for expectant mothers and mothers, and gradual reduction of working time for mothers with small children.
1977 USSR constitution, Article 35
Women in the Peoples Republic of China enjoy equal rights with men in all spheres of life, political, economic, cultural, social, and family life.
The state protects the rights and interests of women, applies the principle of equal pay for equal work for men and women alike and trains and selects cadres from among women.
PRC constitution, Article 48
“Maybe the old traditions of no sex before marriage have merits?”
Of course the old rules had merits, even if those rules were not always observed. (Sadly, I know I did not always keep them, in my misspent youth. And often had cause to regret it - although to be honest, those regrets did not always keep me from breaking the rules when the next temptation presented herself. The spirit is willing, but the flesh...)
A civilization, to survive, has to solve the problem of how to motivate men to fight to defend it.
A man will fight to defend what he considers to be HIS. A man who does not consider he has fixed property he needs to defend, is likely to just take a walk over the next hill when invaders come calling.
Thanks for that post.
Now I’m going to have nightmares of being back in Mrs. Eicher’s English class, endlessly being called to the front to diagram that sentence on the chalkboard.
;-))
But lets narrow the scope.
Let's have a strike for a month by White Heterosexual Conservatives.
Military, police, EMS, doctors, nurses, sanitation, pilots, truck drivers, construction...the whole enchilada.
And don't worry if you're Black, Brown, Asian, Inuit or Ainu.
If you're Conservative you have been branded a "race traitor" and we will be more than happy to accept you as an "Honorary Cracker" for the duration of our strike.
I lived through about 18 months of that in a former line of work.
Women are the gatekeepers mostly because they are hurt the most. Now, anything goes and peer pressure tells them to have fun. Only there is still human nature and it isn’t really fun and there are regrets and eventual anger. Anger leads to blame, blame leads to accusations of assault.
gynocracy = gynonitwittery
Yep
Media propaganda working on not some very bright Americans-—poll today alleges 42% say Kav guilty, 31% say innocent. What a terrible turn for this nation.
Our small right wing media had better get big stories out fast showing the accusers are immoral illegal and trashy. And lying. And involved his anti-Trump work. And social media exposed, for goshsakes.
He *is* innocent, by the way. All of us are innocent unless proven guilty. Thus he is innocent under our system of “justice.”
She had a million of 'em ... what fun she was to be around!! (RIP)
Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.