Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

To: LittleSpotBlog

“Exactly. Flake is a no unless they do an investigation.”

No- he voted yes. The condition he asked for has no legal standing. Grassley said there was a gentleman’s agreement that he would advocate Flakes “condition”. I assume that means that he would do so to McConnell. But no one on the committee has any power to force the “condition”. As long as McConnell says no then everything proceeds as normal.

That is my understanding.


473 posted on 09/28/2018 11:29:33 AM PDT by Revel
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 444 | View Replies ]


To: Revel

What matters is whether Mac has 50 votes without Flake.


478 posted on 09/28/2018 11:30:45 AM PDT by SaxxonWoods (Stop the madness. Make repeated vanity posts a bannable offense.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 473 | View Replies ]

To: Revel

Then Flake votes “no” on Kavanaugh.


480 posted on 09/28/2018 11:31:28 AM PDT by dfwgator (Endut! Hoch Hech!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 473 | View Replies ]

To: Revel
No- he voted yes.

He voted yes for moving out of committee. That doesn't bind him to vote yes for confirmation on the floor. All he has essentially done is say, "I am not going to vote yes on the floor for confirmation unless the vote is postponed for a week." If Mitch doesn't need his vote, it changes nothing. Unfortunately, I doubt The Sistas are going to vote yes on the floor either until the week has passed.

506 posted on 09/28/2018 11:47:19 AM PDT by KevinB (If I'm ever arrested, I'm switching parties.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 473 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson