I completely disagree. You are simply looking for a gotcha. She is instead building up data, likely a few of these questions are from the Senators, but she is being methodlogical. Heck, did you just catch a few points: (1) polygraph on day of grandmother funeral, (2) at hotel, not office, (3) doesn’t know who picked polygrapher, (4) doesn’t know who paid for him, and more...
Can we put a hold on the armchair lawyering for a second?
I’m still stuck on her expressed disappointment that her (alleged 2-yr) friend Mark Judge didn’t return her cheery ‘hi there’ greeting at the safeway - 6 weeks after he allegedly ‘attacked’ her - really bummed her out - not the behavior of a traumatized person
The prosecutor is there to challenge her believability. Each time she catches her in a lie (fear of flying, changing her statements, who she told what to) she adds to the senators ability to justify their vote. I personally think she has done more than enough and that it will likely get even stronger. Hoping so anyway.