See my response above. I see what is happening here. They have something. If they don’t, you are right, but everything points to:
1. Information related to how she got home.
2. Information related to who else was at the party.
3. Information related to her state of intoxication.
4. Information that could ONLY be known by someone actually present because of the dates they covered in the letters.
5. Information that was NOT shared with the senators, polygraph administrator, etc, and could have only been known to someone present.
It’s coming. Her lawyers have to be SWEATING right now - it’s clear as day.
The polygraph report I think said she answered 2 questions about her letter. In testimony she said it took - so long. What if she said to the interviewer that she was really drunk - a report I have heard before. Now in testimony it’s 1 beer. Liar Liar Liar.
Sure HOPING you are right~
Oh, I so hope you are right. Excellent deduction.