Posted on 09/25/2018 9:23:53 AM PDT by bitt
Getting multiple security clearances would need to be consecutive, not concurrent.
They are renewed from time to time, and may increase or decrease with a new position. So a larger number of clearances just means she would have had several different low-level positions, and didn’t need a higher clearance.
Exactly. The attorney seems to be pushing the “multiple” as if it were some kind of “special”.
I believe our best strategy for dealing with the left is to keep them in a constant state of shrieking, and anything that makes their blood vessels pop is in the best interest of the nation.
What I see as "normal" is for the lunatic fringe to be screaming their throats raw. If they aren't screaming, we aren't running the country properly.
Notice the title: “Latest Kavanaugh Accuser Has Multiple Security Clearances.”
This “news” organization is not attributing this claim to the lawyer or anyone else. They are proclaiming it to be a fact.
They are therefore implying that they know who the accuser is, and have verified that she has multiple security clearances.
This is exactly why the media as a whole is not considered an impartial reporter of facts, but a partisan advocacy network.
If they have not verified the claims themselves, they should not be in the headline.
Then why did she have to be dug up 36 hours before a possible vote on Brett Kavanaugh to be a Supreme Court justice?
Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.