[Seaplaner]

That’s why I could never understand why no one was making a bigger deal out of the fact that she couldn’t nail down the date and not even a rough estimate say the second or third week of August. It’s a lie and if she goes first, she cannot be prepared for him answering, oh, I was not in Maryland then.

Excellent post, my good FRiend.

Also, there's the polygraph (it's not a "lie detector") issue.

One suspects that it was faked, and done to PREVENT a comprehensive and well-conducted polygraph.

IF the committee wants to put this to rest, they might only need to ask Ms. Ford words to the effect that...

Would you agree, Dr. Ford, to a carefully proctored and refereed polygraph exam, including a blood test to screen for drugs immediately following the exam?

If she is lying (she is) she would never agree to such terms.

.

[Catphish]

There is no such thing as a “well-conducted” polygraph. It is B.S. pseudo-science.

[etcb]

One suspects that it was faked, and done to PREVENT a comprehensive and well-conducted polygraph.

I would suspect that the committee lawyers have already talked with the polygraph operator and have subpoenaed the report.