To begin with it appears by age 20 when Chrissy Ford was a waitress over at Dewey Beach hitting on anything with pants on she was pretty much hooked on alcohol if not other stuff as well.
It appears that anyone at that party she references and for now we don't know who was there and who doesn't,we don't know where it was exactly, when it took place, and the six players she listed; mostly guys and one gal all don't recall anything about it.
Here's the line on the one gal who supposedly knew about it but was not there. Get this she was formerly married to of all people Mr. alcoholic himself Bob Beckel.
Her name is Leland Keyser.
https://www.themaven.net/theresurgent/erick-erickson/breaking-christine-blasey-ford-s-female-eye-witness-doesn-t-remember-anything-vHwXAKtCgUWdX_jSGdb7mA/
Seems they had two lovely children together as well.
Anyway Leland doesn't remember anything at all so why even list her.
Through the years "balsy" Ford got a bunch of degrees and sort of hid from her earlier days although not her politics. She's a rabid leftist wearing the pink hats and protesting and the whole bit.
One of the bigger questions you wind up with as you go through the story is when did it actually begin? Did it begin when the House of reps gal who gave the letter to di fi who sat on it for weeks? When she finally did give it up it was redacted!!Who the hell edits a letter and refuses to give the original to the US Senate? Anyway inquiring minds don't think it began there.
Hers where the story may have begun.
As someone with a social media company I can tell you that the removal of all on line reference to Dr. Ford including photos and year books, took somewhere between 6 to 12 months to complete. This was planned.
https://twitter.com/MarkYoungTruth/status/1043223145698807808
Young owns a social media company and when he tells you it takes from 6-12 months to scrub the web like balsy's handlers have done believe it.
The next question becomes who has the expertise, the people, the equipment, the legal authority, to scrub the web so no one can find out what was there?
My guess is the company. If this is a deep state project,op,with Soros funding who better to play the game than the company? Who has the experience to coordinate the press with their mockingbird staff and total willingness to sabotage Kavanaugh more than the head of the cabal.
It's a guess but probably not too far off.
Why do it? What's in it for the cabal? The abortion thing is an easy guess and there are always those who think that even though Kavanaugh has described "Roe" as settled law that he can never be trusted to allow planned parent hood to keep selling those baby body parts and killing those babies by the thousand.
Cold there be other reasons however? How about 51/40 thousand sealed indictments depending on whose numbers you use with rumors that many will be tried under military rules in military trials.?
https://www.reddit.com/r/conspiracy/comments/8vh30/sealed_indictments_are_now_at_40000_and_growing/
......................
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=YNahoV0uvPM
Is the deep state being taken down now and would it be to their advantage to get rid of Kavanaugh when the company uses their best and finest excuse for bad behavior at the highest court of the land:
IT'S NATIONAL SECURITY, WE CANT TALK ABOUT IT
How lame is that excuse becoming and who could see through it better than a Kavanaugh?
Also how many dems are in harms way by putting a Kavanaugh on the court especially after we outfoxed them last year by not allowing zero to put his guy up.
It's all quite possible. I guess we shall see how the entire thing plays out this week.
Why do it? What’s in it for the cabal? The abortion thing is an easy guess and there are always those who think that even though Kavanaugh has described “Roe” as settled law that he can never be trusted to allow planned parent hood to keep selling those baby body parts and killing those babies by the thousand.
—
That’s what confuses me. Do they suffer under the illusion that, if they destroy Kavanaugh, that Trump is going to nominate from pro-abortion nutcase to the Supreme Court? Of course he’s not, so they’re right back to square one no matter WHAT they do.
Same disconnect I see in their general “resistance” to Trump. If he wakes up one day and says “screw this” and quits ... they’re going to end up with Mike Pence, who they’d probably hate even MORE than Trump. So why try to get rid of Trump?
Or do they just function on sheer butt-hurt-ness from losing the election - kind of like pussy-hat wearing zombies in “The Walking Dead.”
It appears that Ford is a nut and a drunk, among other things. The PGA knows her.
Hers where the story may have begun.
As someone with a social media company I can tell you that the removal of all on line reference to Dr. Ford including photos and year books, took somewhere between 6 to 12 months to complete. This was planned.
https://twitter.com/MarkYoungTruth/status/1043223145698807808
Agree. This one was planned for whomever the candidate was going to be. Once trump gave his short list the game was on.
Dems using the old “unprovable” to play the fear monger with the voting population.
They figure they can stall the nomination, and then use this to create fear in the general election to drive up their turnout..
Grassley, et al.... Hear us loud and clear , we will mobilize and vote so throw down the gauntlet and ignore the MSM and the kabuki theater....
They don’t like you and never will....
Give in to this and you will forever deal with “ unprovable” regardless of the issue
Although I support Kavanaugh's confirmation, I don't agree with his ruling at the U.S. Court of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit that the federal government’s metadata collection was “entirely consistent” with the Fourth Amendment’s protection against unreasonable searches. I hope, in light of the deep state abuses we have seen since that ruling, that his thinking on this and related issues will evolve toward a more literal reading of the constitution. In fact, I hope SCOTUS in general is willing to defend the 4th now!