Before you have "strong evidence" you have to have some evidence, any evidence, to begin with.
This case is void of any evidence at all. Just vague "recollections" of a drunken party and teenage antics four decades ago.
But the Left doesn't need evidence. They just need to make-up stories and throw them out there for their base to believe. Evidence and facts are immaterial to what they are doing here.
They are simply trying to destroy Kavanaugh with nothing based in reality.
WRKO’s Jeff Kuhner has just brought up the likelihood of a mistaken identity.
Tawana Brawley, Duke Lacrosse, Univ of Virginia, all lies.
According to feminists, when the accuser is a woman and the accused is a man, asking for evidence is sexist.
This is in no way an effort to “destroy someone”. This is an effort to destroy the supreme court that 60+ million people voted for.
To the left, Kavanaugh is a battle in a war for the future of the country. No evidence or facts are needed if an action advances the war effort - and THIS BATTLE must be won at any cost and with any tactics.
Get used to it, because the war will not end until a democrat is in the WH. Even if Kavanaugh is seated, one D has already said they will keep investigating and if they win the house you can expect more of this daily. For millions of liberals, LITERALLY NOTHING is out of bounds when it comes to dominating the courts with lefties and dominating the country with courts.
p
Let us rededicate ourselves to Our Last Chance? [Can Donald Trump Revive The "Spirit of '76?].
If the Committee is to be a Jury Conduct a Voir Dire of the members
and reject all who have already made up their minds. .
“Section 4.
“The President, Vice President and all civil officers of the United States, shall be removed from office on impeachment for, and conviction of, treason, bribery, or other high crimes and misdemeanors.
“Section 2.
“The President...shall nominate, and by and with the advice and consent of the Senate, shall appoint...judges of the Supreme Court, and all other officers of the United States.”
In theory, the House could impeach Kavanaugh for crimes committed in 1982.
Has any Democrat in the House, such as Congresswoman Eshoo, introduced a bill to do so?
If the accuser wants an investigation, perhaps she should discuss the sexual assault statute of Maryland with her attorney and press charges with Maryland law enforcement.
She must have known, as we did, that Kavanaugh is the best person available for the job.
Why did she delay going fully public?
Feinstein should be censured for this stunt and lose her security clearance for this and feeding a Chinese spy info for 20 years. There needs to be a price paid for that level of idiocy or maybe it was done on purpose to fatten her pocketbook. I don’t know.
Either way she should not be allowed any responsibility except for the basic yes or no vote any senator has.
bkmk