Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

To: SeekAndFind

Those we’re the false flag rumors. We’re into actually facts here.


8 posted on 09/20/2018 10:57:40 AM PDT by cuban leaf
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]


To: cuban leaf
"Those were the false flag rumors. We're into actually facts here."

Actually, the NYT only “debunked” 2 of the 5 stories. Both of them had already been corrected. The story about the student reviews of the teacher had already been corrected. The story about Kavanaugh’s mother and the mortgage case had already been clarified.

The New York Times did not debunk the Gorsuch letter. The original article said they had heard about it but could not verify it. The NYT said, “There is no known letter sent by Dr. Blasey about Justice Gorsuch.” That is exactly what the original article said.

The NYT did not “debunk” the story that Dr. Blasey is a major Democratic donor with a long history of left-wing activism. Their Verdict: Mostly false is deceptive.

The NYT refused to explain why she scrubbed her social media accounts. The NYT said, “It’s possible that the phrases appeared in posts that have since been deleted from Dr. Blasey’s accounts.”

In other words the claim is true, but much of the evidence has been deleted by Christine Blasey.

The NYT did not “debunk” the story that “Dr. Blasey’s brother worked at a law firm with ties to the Russia investigation.” The NYT said that it was “Misleading.”

In fact, the claim is true but more information is needed to determine if it is relevant.

65 posted on 09/20/2018 12:06:19 PM PDT by detective
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 8 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson