If you read the article, it basically says claims 2, 4 and 5 are true but don’t matter:
* “Yes, Kavanaugh’s mother did rule on a foreclosure against her parents, but the ruling gave the parents enough breathing room actually helped then avoid foreclosure in the end”, Like liberals are going to have an ounce of gratitude?
* “Yes, Blasey is a democratic donor with a long history of activism but she doesn’t have enough money to be a MAJOR donor.” Therefore she must be completely objective, with no political motivations?
* “Yes, Blasey’s brother works for the law firm that hired Fusion GPS on behalf of the DNC, but her brother isn’t personally linked to the fajw Russia scandal yet.” It’s just a coincidence that the people involved in these things always have ties back to the same small circle of people in a nation of 320 million people.
Even claim number 3, that she has made these same claims about others is not false, just not definitely proved yet.
Only the claim about her negative Rate-My-Professor reviews seems to be a case of mistaken identity.
Thanks!
However, she scrubbed all her reviews. She is the only professor out of 700 at the two colleges she teaches at that does not have a review.
She also scrubbed all of her social media accounts before coming out.