Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

To: Eddie01

So any woman can make a decades old, unproven claim about a Supreme Court nominee and put the nomination on hold? It’s a terrible way to run a government. It’s complete insanity.


23 posted on 09/19/2018 3:39:31 PM PDT by Crucial
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]


To: Crucial; Eddie01
So any woman can make a decades old, unproven claim about a Supreme Court nominee and put the nomination on hold? It’s a terrible way to run a government. It’s complete insanity.
The answer to this is so obvious; all Mrs. Kavenaugh has to do to put paid to this is simply point out that her husband is the victim of a vast political conspiracy - and if she is OK with Judge Kavenaugh, that is all that matters.

For extra credit, she can add, “What difference, at this point, does it make?”

Then - according to precedent (which as they have made clear is beloved of Democrats, see Roe v. Wade) - not only is Judge Kavenaugh entirely exonerated, but Mrs. Kavenaugh would stand to be nominated for president of the United States.


46 posted on 09/19/2018 4:17:12 PM PDT by conservatism_IS_compassion (Journalism promotes itself - and promotes big government - by speaking ill of society.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 23 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson