SEVEN REASONS WHY SHE IS NOT CREDIBLE
1) First, why, if this happened, didn’t this 15-year-old girl immediately tell her parents that she was attacked and then report to the police? The police could then have questioned everyone at the “gathering.” She says she thought Kavanaugh would inadvertently kill her, yet she does not report this to her parents and the police? This isn’t credible. According to the Post, her explanation is as follows:
“My biggest fear was, do I look like someone just attacked me? I’m not ever telling anyone this. This is nothing, it didn’t happen, and he didn’t rape me.”
Her parents would not believe her because she didn’t look as though someone had attacked her? What parents will not believe their 15-year-old daughter who runs home to tell them drunken boys tried to rape her?
2. Kavanaugh has been investigated by the FBI for appointments to the D.C. Circuit Court of Appeals, White House counsel, and other federal jobs. Why didn’t Ford call the FBI so the FBI could investigate Kavanaugh?
3. Mark Judge, Who was supposed to be present, has denied the accusation.
4. According to her husband, the motivation for telling the therapist in 2012 was that Kavanaugh might be appointed to the Supreme Court. This shows political motivation: she does not want Kavanaugh on the Supreme Court, although she did not care that he was on the D.C. Circuit Court of Appeals.
5. Why write to a “local government representative” on July 6, 2018 and then Feinstein on July 30, 2018 instead of contacting the FBI? The “local” Democrat and Feinstein should have immediately referred this to the FBI for investigation. Feinstein should have immediately shared the letter with the entire Judiciary Committee so members could question Kavanaugh. Instead, Feinstein played a political game to wait for an ambush.
6. Note the odd language in the letter. She was at a “gathering,” not a party. She contacted her “local Democratic representative” to find out how to proceed. She is a college professor, yet she acts as though she doesn’t know to call the FBI. She says she received “medical treatment” “for the assault,” but aside from one couples therapy session in 2012, there is no mention of any other treatment.
7. Ford said there were four boys at the “gathering.” Her attorney, Debra Katz, now says there was a girl present.
Ford’s letter of July 30 and her therapy notes of 2012 show her motivation and provide much material for a vigorous cross-examination if this were a case handled by real attorneys.
The kind of violent behavior the accuser describes would come with a history of violence. The assailant would have perpetrated other acts of violence both prior and subsequent to this act.
When are they going to introduce DNA evidence? That would settle it for me (sarc).
Even as late as the 1980’s, behavior as described would not have been called a sexual assault by even parents of that era. I was one and had similar experiences with my kids.They would have reacted to the boy’s parents and school, but not the police. We have very different standards today. If they were all drinking, and that is certainly possible, a 35 year old memory of any teenaged kid drunk at a party is no reason to cancel a Supreme Court career; or any career really.
This only gets the prize for Most Obvious Fake Accusation Ever if a forged signature can be added to a yearbook and lacrosse players can be maligned.
Is Feinstein guilty of Obstruction of Justice for failing to report this crime to the authorities at the time she became aware of it?
Did she think the allegations were not credible at the time? If so, why does she think they are now?
She withheld information in order to release it later, for political gain. Is this not a crime?
She probably wasn’t supposed to be at the party. The other girl took her there and back.
But then, wouldn’t she have told the other girl on the way back what had happened?
Even if she didn’t want to tell her parents or teh authorities (due to fear that she’d get in trouble), why wouldn’t she tell someone, a girlfriend, a cousin, somebody? Taht’s what women do, even if they don’t want to call teh authorities. Isn’t it?
Also—why did she scrub her social media posts? Most likely there was material there which would have disproven her current allegations. But Facebook & other companies won’t retrieve the deleted material because that would help Kavanaugh.