Is it too much of a coincidence that she names a witness (Mark Judge) someone who published a book in 1997 ("Wasted: Tales of a Genx Drunk") about his alcoholism - which included blacking out - starting as an adolescent in the same prep school at the same time as Kavanaugh? Just the witness she certainly knew could not reliably be used to disprove her allegation.
She named Mark Judge as being present. What if he was not actually available for the time period in question? Perhaps something to do with attempting treatment of his alcohol dependency?