When did you hear about the party?
What were you told about the party?
Were you told there would alcohol?
Were you invited to the party or did you crash the party?
Did you attend alone or with friends?
What time was the party?
Can you name other people at the party or just Brett?
How long were you at the party?
Did you have anything to drink before you left for the party or on the way to the party?
Who did you talk to at the party?
Were you in the close company of other women or men?
After the immediate alleged event, did you tell anyone at the party?
Did you leave immediately?
Did you leave alone or with friends?
Did you tell anyone immediately after the alleged event?
The next day or following days did you tell anyone?
Did you keep a diary that recorded the event?
Etc...
When she lies, bring in witnesses with personal or even hearsay information to establish her character.
I wouldn’t ask most of those questions.
I would ask if she had the name of any other person at the party.
I would ask if she had the name of any person she told about what happened within the first year after it happened.
I would ask if she had the name of any other person who could testify to her naming either of the two men, before 2012.
If anybody objects, say that you want to take the allegations seriously, and are looking for anybody else who could lend credence to the claim.
Nobody needs to make her look bad, or “win an argument with her”. If the end facts are her statement, and the statements of BK, and the witness Mr. Judge, most people will realize you can’t hang a person on such a thin reed.
And the republicans can make speeches about how, having seen how little evidence there was, they understand why the democrats were so reluctant to even bring it up, and for good measure wonder why they haven’t done more with the overwhelming evidence of Keith Ellison assaulting two women.