Posted on 09/11/2018 10:23:08 AM PDT by detective
Shortened title.
Full title: HUGE! Joe DiGenova: Yates, Rice, Biden, Comey and Obama Met in White House to Discuss Targeting Mike Flynn
During the infamous January 5, 2017 White House meeting Sally Yates, Susan Rice, Joe Biden, James Comey and Barack Obama discussed how they would target General Michael Flynn.
This is a huge development!
1. Mueller has told close confidants he was handed “a piece of crap on collusion.” But investigated it further with no fruits.
2. DiGenova mentions, “James Baker, former FBI General Counsel, is a cooperating witness in a case against James Comey.”
3. DiGenova says there will be one more indictment related to Lying to the FBI. However “the Mueller Probe is coming to an end with NO indictments about collusion whatsoever.”
(Excerpt) Read more at thegatewaypundit.com ...
Obama and the Democrats' criminal activities escalated b/c Hillary was a shoo-in----
reliably expected to be declared the 2016 winner, ready to sweep all the dirt under the rug.
(hat tip centurion316)
Their fearless leader Obama had Democrats believing the propaganda: he was invincible, he could move the govt apparat against any American that stood in his way. Hillary would serve out his third term. Everything was in place. They’d destroy the Republican Party, and seize total power, power to be held in perpetuity. Operating as an organized criminal enterprise was encouraged. The problem: they were so cocksure of themselves, their criminal activities escalated before Hillary Clinton was scheduled to be declared the 2016 winner.
Trump's short presence in office shows the world how a republic should be governed. Trump's way differs dramatically with his accursed predecessors. Under the onerous reign of the Clintons and Obama, the US stumbled into the 21st Century.....these Democrat lamebrains fomented Islamic terrorism, destroyed the US economy, and entrapped us in the false hope of globalism.
Typical know-nothing Democrats, Clinton and Obama made matters worse, with economic policies that stank to high heaven, by bailing out and nationalizing our big banks, by stupid discredited Democratism that relied on spending our way to oblivion.
Even more egregiously, the accursed Clinton and Obama unblinkingly forfeited US sovereignty, showering US riches on any stumblebum that managed to cross the border.
Obama and the Democrats' criminal activities escalated b/c Hillary was a shoo-in----
reliably expected to be declared the 2016 winner, ready to sweep all the dirt under the rug.
(hat tip centurion316)
Their fearless leader Obama had Democrats believing the propaganda: he was invincible, he could move the govt apparat against any American that stood in his way. Hillary would serve out his third term. Everything was in place. They’d destroy the Republican Party, and seize total power, power to be held in perpetuity. Operating as an organized criminal enterprise was encouraged. The problem: they were so cocksure of themselves, their criminal activities escalated before Hillary Clinton was scheduled to be declared the 2016 winner.
Trump's short presence in office shows the world how a republic should be governed. Trump's way differs dramatically with his accursed predecessors. Under the onerous reign of the Clintons and Obama, the US stumbled into the 21st Century.....these Democrat lamebrains fomented Islamic terrorism, destroyed the US economy, and entrapped us in the false hope of globalism.
Typical know-nothing Democrats, Clinton and Obama made matters worse, with economic policies that stank to high heaven, by bailing out and nationalizing our big banks, by stupid discredited Democratism that relied on spending our way to oblivion.
Even more egregiously, the accursed Clinton and Obama unblinkingly forfeited US sovereignty, showering US riches on any stumblebum that managed to cross the border.
Well how in HELL can they let THIS go whilr continuing to “investigate” Trump for what was done TO Trump???
We are worse than a banana republic.
“Di Genova knows all this how?”
Former US Attorney Joe Di Genova has many friends and associates in the DOJ and the Federal government as a whole.
I’m sure these insiders are the source of his information.
If you believe that he just made it up out of thin air, that is your opinion.
We have had a corrupt government in Washington DC. The people from the Obama administration and the media have been caught lying many times. They have also been caught covering up information.
Di Genova has been far more accurate than Comey, Rice, Obama or any of the official sources of information.
If he gets the job, talk about "Crap Hitting the FAN"!
just reading between the lines of FakeNewsCNN would suggest DiGenova is on to something. besides, how extraordinary Obama was talking about Comey informing him “in the next few weeks” etc when President Trump would be inaugurated 2 weeks after the meeting? unbelievable:
12 Feb: CNN: Obama admin discussed how much to share about Russia with incoming Trump team
By Manu Raju, Jeremy Herb and Marshall Cohen,
President Barack Obama met in January 2017 with then-FBI Director James Comey and other top national security officials to discuss sharing information related to Russia with the incoming Trump administration, where Obama stated that the Trump-Russia investigation should be handled “by the book,” according to an email made public Monday and a source familiar with the matter.
The previously undisclosed meeting was memorialized in an email written by then-National Security Adviser Susan Rice on Donald Trump’s Inauguration Day...
A person familiar with the January 5, 2017, meeting said the Obama administration wanted to know whether the FBI and others in the intelligence community believed there was a national security reason to limit conversations with the Trump transition about Russia because some on the incoming President’s team could be compromised.
The email was disclosed by Senate Judiciary Chairman Chuck Grassley and Sen. Lindsey Graham, who sent a letter Monday to Rice asking why she had sent the email to herself on the day of Trump’s inauguration about an Oval Office meeting on Russian election interference. The meeting included Obama, Vice President Joe Biden, Comey and former Deputy Attorney General Sally Yates...
“There is nothing ‘unusual’ about the National Security Advisor memorializing an important discussion for the record,” Kathryn Ruemmler, a counsel for Rice, said in a statement. “The Obama White House was justifiably concerned about how comprehensive they should be in their briefings regarding Russia to members of the Trump transition team, particularly Lt. General Michael Flynn, given the concerning communications between him and Russian officials.”...
Rice wrote in the email that the meeting she referenced was a “brief, follow-on conversation” after Obama was briefed the same day by Comey, then-Director of National Intelligence James Clapper, then-CIA Director John Brennan and National Security Agency Director Adm. Mike Rogers about the soon-to-be-published intelligence community report that concluded that Russia meddled in the election to help Trump win. That briefing included mention of the relationship between incoming National Security Adviser Michael Flynn and then-Russian Ambassador to the US Sergey Kislyak, according to The Washington Post, as well as mention of the dossier.
As a foreign diplomat from a hostile country, Kislyak’s communications were regularly under surveillance authorized by the Foreign Intelligence Surveillance Act. He spoke by phone to Flynn in late December 2016, when Flynn told Kislyak that the incoming Trump administration would appreciate if Moscow did not retaliate, according to court filings...
Rice wrote: “The President asked Comey to inform him if anything changes in the next few weeks that should affect how we share classified information with the incoming team. Comey said he would.”...
https://edition.cnn.com/2018/02/12/politics/susan-rice-email-russia-investigation-trump-team/index.html
I am not saying you should not argue politics with liberals.
But you must realize liberals are not honest.
They are not interested in the truth.
Liberals refuse to believe anything that shows they are wrong and will repeat utter nonsense over and over.
Don’t let liberals decide what is or is not credible.
The liberals I argue with (I’ve been doing it since 2005), use these primary tools:
1. ad-hominem’
2. Projection
3. Deflection
They also pepper in a lot of straw men and red herrings. Frankly, many of them can be summed up if you watch Kamala Harris argue with Kavanaugh about talking to attorneys.
I frustrate the hell out of them because they can’t help but get angry and I’m always polite. Drives them nuts.
Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.