Posted on 09/10/2018 12:12:40 PM PDT by yesthatjallen
Wait!!!
Weiner got Strzok ‘d?
Just remember the rules. It’s only a conspiracy if Republicans do it.
Ha.
It would be interesting to know the number of emails reviewed in the Hillary investigation over the number of hours vs. the supposed number of Weiner emails reviewed over 12 hours.
Anyone with 1/2 a brain knew in November 2016 that not all the emails were reviewed.
I’m interested to know theories about why Comey even brought up the Weiner stuff so close to the election. Was it cover in case in came out after Hillary was elected. Hahaha. Still find joy in Hillary’s loss. It just never gets old.
So Strzok, Comey and Weiner finally come together in the same sentence.
Comey = obstruction of justice...haul him in.
My thought too. Subversion and perversion meet prevarication.
I'm thinking it's because he had multiple female left-wing nutcases screaming at him from every direction. Valerie Jarrett, Loretta Lynch, Hillary Clinton, and Michelle Obama, were probably on his case so much he just lost it completely and started just doing random things, including giving weird press conferences.
I’m sure Sessions will get right on it.
I think he brought it up so he could clear her of it. And to Show her she owes him something for helping to clear her.He isn’t the sharpest tool in shed.
I wonder if any of these folks feel any fear of what may be in their future?
In their arrogance, prolly not.
Several years from now, Sessions will be the main focus of all. Was he involved in a sting or a coverup for the DS. Except for the Q folks, the answer is still for debate and future analysis. Meanwhile, Sessions is letting the DS run the show. Even if he has indicted millions and has already executed them, we as a public have a right to know. Trump has no say in the matter(s). Meanwhile the DS is still running the show.
Yes, Comey brought it up so that they could put it to bed and not have it hanging around after Ms. Hillary was elected as a possible cloud over her administration.
If they thought that she was going to lose they never would have brought any of this up.
Yeah, I'm sure that's in there too.
Also he thought it wouldn't really matter because she was going to win the election, and he'd join all the other people who thought they were owed something because they helped carry her over the finish line.
She might have given each of them something. She also might have had some of them thrown in ADX, or taken out in a field somewhere and shot.
I believe that the title is BS. Along with a similar title like this from the other day. The titles suggest that physical finger prints were found on documents and yet the stories do not support that conclusion. I believe they are using “finger prints” as a figure of speech, but they do not make that clear either. I hate BS misleading titles like this. SHAME on the author.
Trump has a say in one matter. He can fire Beauregard’s sorry @$$.
Do it right after the elections, Mr President.
Strzok’s fingerprints are on Wiener’s laptop. Can’t make that headline up. Strzok needs to quit monkeying with himself. Now that is boom, boom, boom.
Strzok and the weiner. They could have really come up with a better title.
Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.