Not that I believe anything the NY Slimes prints, but if it is for real who do you think it is? Sessions? Sounds like it to me.
It could be anyone or nobody at all.
I don't get it. There is no meat in the op-ed piece. Nothing juicy at all.
Boo hoo. Trump is too nice to Putin, too mean to our "traditional" allies. This is news? Swamp crybabies have been whining about this since it began.
So why is the Times hanging their reputation on this empty nothingburger of a piece? I'm not seeing what their end game is here.
Got to be someone that fancies themself a paragon of virtue. Also must possess the type of condescending arrogance routinely found in the deep state. A perfect example would be an ex Senator full of himself. That’s why I thought of Sessions first.
Note the word “lodestar” and the talk about morality. That’s all classic Pence.
Conveniently, the only person in the administration who can’t be fired.