[Genoa]

Very valid point taken, but they’re hardly “young.”

[Repealthe17thAmendment]

I’d say 13 and 10 are young for that environment.

[Flick Lives]

Very valid point taken, but they’re hardly “young.”

—

The kids are 13 and 10.

[Sasparilla]

...Very valid point taken, but they’re hardly “young.”

One maybe 13. The other a preteen.
Too young to be exposed to hate filled liberal lunatics.

[This I Wonder32460]

They’re not preshoolers if that’s your definition of young. But to me ages 10 and 13 is young, as is any age under 18. For them to hear the vitriol and experience the turmoil that msm-dems create is much more than what a nominee’s children should have to experience. Their mother was wise to guide them out of a hearing that I imagine was becoming filled with vile, irrational democrat hostility against their beloved father.

[wardaddy]

They’re 10 and 13

That’s young

[Brown Deer]

...but they’re hardly “young.”

The oldest is only 13!

[heights]

“Very valid point taken, but they’re hardly “young.””

They are Ten and Thirteen? Are you f****** insane?

[Jane Long]

but they’re hardly “young.”....

Where's the face palm emoji?

🤦🏻‍♂️

[Pure Country]

Actually, it would probably be easier on his daughters if they were younger. At their age they are aware of what is being said.

[Catmom]

Would your folks have kept you around that kind of language when your were 10?

[henbane]

Very valid point taken, but they’re hardly “young.”

[Graybeard58]

Very valid point taken, but they’re hardly “young.”

>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>

I wouldn’t let Joe Biden anywhere near them.

[Fightin Whitey]

Very valid point taken, but they’re hardly “young.”

What do you call a ten-year-old? Mature? And thirteen--wizened?

[COBOL2Java]

Very valid point taken, but they’re hardly “young.”

And how many kids do you have?