Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

To: unlearner

LOL and P.S. where did I call someone personally “anti Christ”? No where. I said that this teaching or belief in a Frankenchrist — a bloodless resurrected Jesus belief or teaching is anti Christ, because it borders on denying Jesus is come in the flesh.

Your grades in English syntax and grammar must have been very poor.

Please stop bugging me. Face it, all you want to do is make this about me and attack me.

This is all about your misplaced trust in Cruz.


93 posted on 09/04/2018 1:58:15 AM PDT by Sontagged (TY Lord Jesus for being the Way, the Truth & the Life. Have mercy on those trapped in the Snake Pit!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 91 | View Replies ]


To: Sontagged

“where did I call someone personally ‘anti Christ’?”

In the post to which you are responding I did not say that YOU did anything. I simply gave an example of what someone might say that would constitute a personal attack.

So, if someone hypothetically called someone antichrist or Satan, that would be a personal attack. And if she were to claim to not have done so even when she did, she would be a liar. And if she were to accuse others of personal attacks she would be a hypocrite.

These are just simple, logical statements. Choose to apply them in whatever manner you wish.

“Your grades in English syntax and grammar must have been very poor.”

A person who claims to have spiritual discernment but always gets clairvoyant guesses wrong should discontinue such practices.

For the record, I have a 4.0 GPA as an English major.

I have also completed other educational tracks which I don’t care to discuss or disclose in full detail, but needless to say that when it comes to writing there are various settings in which formal and informal linguistic styles are appropriate or not.

It is characteristic of people with severe narcissistic tendencies to lash out at those who disagree with them and to attempt to find fault. Such people have a deep need to be affirmed, but they often offend those around them by their habitual demands to be the center of attention and to be listened to with respect. Such people do not treat others in the same way they demand to be treated by others. Ultimately narcissists surround themselves with miserable sycophants who usually have no choice but to endure the abuse of the narcissists.

Occasionally people with such tendencies manage to get and accept help. But usually they just destroy everyone around them. And the acceptance and approval they deeply need never exists because they will not do the difficult task of changing their behavior.

“all you want to do is make this about me and attack me. This is all about your misplaced trust in Cruz.”

It is logically impossible for all of something to be about 2 diametrically different things. Your above statements do not even need to be refuted because they are self-defeating. You have disproved yourself.

My so-called “trust” in Cruz extends no further than his commitment to carry out his duties as a senator guided by the conservative principles he has committed to. To the extent he does so, he will have my support. And if otherwise he will have my criticism.

Rational people KNOW that Cruz’ seat is a MUST-WIN.

For anyone on a conservative forum to be attacking him at this point in time is truly insane.


94 posted on 09/04/2018 5:16:22 PM PDT by unlearner (A war is coming.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 93 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson