I said your personal attacks are insane and strident.
And weird.
But notice I didn’t discuss your character, only your behavior.
You, on the other hand, have slammed/slandered me personally and I have reported both old and new posts.
That you nosed into my discussions with people I actually care a lot about on their “bloodless Resrurrected Christ” threads... of which I corrected them strongly, as Paul tells us to do, and then proved them absolutely wrong about their theory...
All I can say is by your logic, Paul was “slandering” those who preached a different Gospel than what had already been preached when he said:
“If I or an angel from heaven preaches any other gospel than that which has already been preached, let him be accursed”.
See, we are to correct doctrine. And I did so, accurately.
Which brings me back to Cruz.
I really really would love to debate someone on Cruz’s “Christian doctrine” that allowed him to have a Mormon pray over him as Beck did with that strange Freemason-y ritual.
How a man stands with Christ is the true measure of a man, and again, Cruz stepped in occultic poop.
Now back to you, a personal attack is never an attack on someone’s logic. It is a personal attack or personal abuse when you slam that FReeper personally.
Which you have done, over and over and over. End of story.
Finally, Ted Cruz is a RINO and fake Tea Partier and Trump is making a “story of the snake” mistake in “trusting” lyin’ Ted.
“I have reported both old and new posts”
There is NOTHING in my new post that is or will be construed by anyone else as a personal attack. I took great care to be sure of this.
A person who makes false accusations is a liar.
“That you nosed into my discussions”
These things referred to as “my discussions” are on a public forum. There is a saying about people who live in glass houses. That goes doubly for public statements. Public statements are going to be scrutinized and critiqued.
“I really really would love to debate someone on Cruz’s ‘Christian doctrine’ that allowed him to have a Mormon pray over him as Beck did with that strange Freemason-y ritual.”
That would be interesting for a number of reasons. First, in order for a debate to occur, participants must actually listen to the other side. People who shout their odious opinions from a soap box (especially one that doesn’t even belong to them) and then stop their ears are not engaging in debate.
Second, I supported and voted for Cruz against Dewhurst in his first primary for the senate race. I voted for him as a senator. And I made sure to bring others with me to support him in some of the contests. At no time did I ask myself if Cruz would make a great theologian or church minister. That never occurred to me.
There are certain people on this forum who place their own flawed Bible interpretation up on a pedestal while simultaneously slandering not only conservative leaders like Ted Cruz but godly Bible teachers as well. God will judge these false prophets and prophetesses as He said He would like that woman Jezebel in Revelation.
“I corrected them strongly, as Paul tells us to do, and then proved them absolutely wrong about their theory...”
Where does Paul tell “us” to go around correcting everyone “strongly”?
He told men of God who were appointed over churches to correct those within the congregations for which they were responsible. These were men (not women) such as Timothy and Titus. And they had been appointed over churches. They were not sent out to correct everyone out in the world either.
1 Timothy 3:15
I write so that you may know how you ought to conduct yourself in the house of God, which is the church of the living God, the pillar and ground of the truth.
1 Corinthians 5:12-13
For what have I to do with judging those also who are outside? Do you not judge those who are inside? But those who are outside God judges. Therefore “put away from yourselves the evil person.”
1 Timothy 2:12
And I do not permit a woman to teach or to have authority over a man, but to be in silence.