Posted on 08/31/2018 7:51:25 AM PDT by Magnatron
With speculation hot among the president's legal team that today could be a day for action by Bob Mueller (last working day before Labor Day), remember all the evidence the special counsel has or could have that we haven't seen.
Why it matters, from Bob Bauer, former White House counsel to President Obama, and now an NYU Law professor: "Investigators have the skills and resources to turn up evidence, including witness testimony, that goes beyond what anyone on the outside can imagine in the daily speculation about the Mueller probe." "How many had heard of George Papadopoulos until the day we heard of George Papadopoulos?" "Who would have predicted an indictment, like the one brought against Russian intelligence officials, that reads like the synopsis of a le Carré novel?"
The evidence we've yet to see:
- President Trump's tax returns. - Trump bank records, which are more valuable than tax returns. - Internal Trump Organization records. - More recordings from Michael Cohen. - Cellphone records (metadata showing calls placed/received and duration) related to the Trump Tower meeting. - White House and campaign emails and text messages. (Trump's legal team said in January that the White House had produced more than 20,000 pages of materials, and the campaign had provided more than 1.4 million pages.) - Contemporaneous notes of White House staffers from meetings with Trump. - A full reconstruction by former national security adviser Michael Flynn, who made a plea deal, of his conversations about Russia and subsequent lies. Scores of hours of testimony of Trump insiders (including at least 20 White House personnel) about his private dealings, much of which is unknown to POTUS and the public. - National Enquirer files revealed by today's N.Y. Times: Trump and Cohen "devised a plan to buy up all the dirt on Mr. Trump that the National Enquirer and its parent company had collected on him, dating back to the 1980s."
As MSNBC analyst Matt Miller summarized: "Basically, everything!"
I agree with your points. I’m especially aggrieved when they use a false headline, in order to push their view. That’s the same thing the lying MSM does, and I hate to see conservative sites doing it, too.
The Hill does have a lot of liberal tripe, but they also have several excellent conservative writers. Read the comments sections; it makes liberals hopping mad when The Hill publishes conservative articles.
His tax returns and bank accounts.
Holy moly.
What a bunch of jealous little cucks.
Agreed. You might want to check out www.WhatFinger.com Conservative with a better layout.
The entire rationale for this article is that Mueller has to act now or wait until after the election. It’s a great time to create some clickbait buzz to libel Trump in the absence of any real news.
However, the thesis is entirely unfounded: Mueller is quite capable of an October Surprise. Mueller is running a political inquisition with a political objective, not a truth-seeking investigation in the interest of justice.
Thanks!
Short summary: they have a whole lot of nothing.
Lavrentiy Beria: “Show me the man, and Ill find you the crime.”
Absolutely.
The only worthwhile part of this liberal dream article is the unabashed honesty of their purpose: it is all about "getting Trump" and the Russia! Russia! Russia! thing is just a very thin smoke screen. They have forsaken the collusion idea for the most part in this article and shown their true intentions: to unseat a duly elected president by whatever means possible.
“Axios is a left wing propaganda site................
Then why is Drudge reporting it above the fold as a top news story?”
Drudge is a Click-Bait faggot. He cares about a penis up his anus and a pocket full of cash, and that’s it.
Just a shell. No bomb.
Drudge has become an old fool re where he is going with his website.
Just because Axios and its idiot writer huff and puff about “records”, many of which are not producible under the law (since there is no crime of “collusion”), why should they be trusted just as why should Chuck Todd be trusted about a “Friday” bombshell from Mueller?
More like a silent fart in the bathroom. Drudge has got to learn to ignore the “hype” or he will lose more readers. I never was one as I saw what he was doing in a dangerous shotgun manner which no smart journalist should ever do.
Unless you’ve got the fact, never “hype”.
Drudge’s income comes from delivering massive numbers of advertisements to visitors’ screens. Everything he does or doesn’t put on his site is designed to protect or enhance that income stream, including the auto refresh scam that delivers a new ad every few minutes even though there is no other change in content.
His deeds speak louder than their words!
All based on a setup, all information derived from illegal wiretaps and illegal seizures IMO.
—
A real crime was committed to try and entrap the Trump campaign in a fake crime.
Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.