Yes, but liberalism must be defined as broader than simply economic statism or sexual licentiousness, but rather as the totality of rebellion against God. The Satanic Cardinal Bernardin’s collaborator Saul Alinsky got it right when he identified Satan as the father of radicals.
I’ve worded that overly ambiguously. I mean to broaden what is meant by liberalism to include all rebellion against God, not to say that what is called liberalism is alone what comprises rebellion against God.