Posted on 08/26/2018 12:10:00 AM PDT by dangus
[ The testimony is far worse than the title suggests. Nuncio Archibishop Vigano claims that McCarrick was part of an inner circle of abuse enablers which got Francis elected in the first place, and which included Secretary of States Bertone and Angelo Sodano.]
1 TESTIMONY
by His Excellency Carlo Maria Viganò Titular Archbishop of Ulpiana Apostolic Nuncio In this tragic moment for the Church in various parts of the world — the United States, Chile, Honduras, Australia, etc. — bishops have a very grave responsibility.
I am thinking in particular of the United States of America, where I was sent as Apostolic Nuncio by Pope Benedict XVI on October 19, 2011, the memorial feast of the First North American Martyrs. The Bishops of the United States are called, and I with them, to follow the example of these first martyrs who brought the Gospel to the lands of America, to be credible witnesses of the immeasurable love of Christ, the Way, the Truth and the Life. Bishops and priests, abusing their authority, have committed horrendous crimes to the detriment of their faithful, minors, innocent victims, and young men eager to offer their lives to the Church, or by their silence have not prevented that such crimes continue to be perpetrated.
To restore the beauty of holiness to the face of the Bride of Christ, which is terribly disfigured by so many abominable crimes, and if we truly want to free the Church from the fetid swamp into which she has fallen, we must have the courage to tear down the culture of secrecy and publicly confess the truths we have kept hidden. We must tear down the conspiracy of silence with which bishops and priests have protected themselves at the expense of their faithful, a conspiracy of silence that in the eyes of the world risks making the Church look like a sect, a conspiracy of silence not so dissimilar from the one that prevails in the mafia. “Whatever you have said in the dark ... shall be proclaimed from the housetops”(Lk. 12:3).
I had always believed and hoped that the hierarchy of the Church could find within itself the spiritual resources and strength to tell the whole truth, to amend and to renew itself. That is why, even though I had repeatedly been asked to do so, I always avoided making statements to the media, even when it would have been my right to do so, in order to defend myself against the calumnies published about me, even by high-ranking prelates of the Roman Curia.
But now that the corruption has reached the very top of the Church’s hierarchy, my conscience dictates that I reveal those truths regarding the heart-breaking case of the Archbishop Emeritus of Washington, D.C., Theodore McCarrick, which I came to know in the course of the duties entrusted to me by St. John Paul II, as Delegate for Pontifical Representations, from 1998 to 2009, and by Pope Benedict XVI, as Apostolic Nuncio to the United States of America, from October 19, 2011 until end of May 2016. As Delegate for Pontifical Representations in the Secretariat of State, my responsibilities were not limited to the Apostolic Nunciatures, but also included the staff of the Roman Curia (hires, promotions, informational processes on candidates to the episcopate, etc.) and the examination of delicate cases, including those regarding cardinals and bishops, that were entrusted to the Delegate by the Cardinal Secretary of State or by the Substitute of the Secretariat of State.
To dispel suspicions insinuated in several recent articles, I will immediately say that the Apostolic Nuncios in the United States, Gabriel Montalvo and Pietro Sambi, both prematurely deceased, did not fail to inform the Holy See immediately, as soon as they learned of Archbishop McCarrick’s gravely immoral behavior with seminarians and priests.
Indeed, according to what Nuncio Pietro Sambi wrote, Father Boniface Ramsey, O.P.’s letter, dated November 22, 2000, was written at the request of the late Nuncio Montalvo. In the letter, Father Ramsey, who had been a professor at the diocesan seminary in Newark from the end of the ’80s until 1996, affirms that there was a recurring rumor in the seminary that the Archbishop “shared his bed with seminarians,” inviting five at a time to spend the weekend with him at his beach house. And he added that he knew a certain number of seminarians, some of whom were later ordained priests for the Archdiocese of Newark, who had been invited to this beach house and had shared a bed with the Archbishop.
The office that I held at the time was not informed of any measure taken by the Holy See after those charges were brought by Nuncio Montalvo at the end of 2000, when Cardinal Angelo Sodano was Secretary of State. Likewise, Nuncio Sambi transmitted to the Cardinal Secretary of State, Tarcisio Bertone, an Indictment Memorandum against McCarrick by the priest Gregory Littleton of the diocese of Charlotte, who was reduced to the lay state for a violation of minors, together with two documents from the same Littleton, in which he recounted his tragic story of sexual abuse by the then-Archbishop of Newark and several other priests and seminarians. The Nuncio added that Littleton had already forwarded his Memorandum to about twenty people, including civil and ecclesiastical judicial authorities, police and lawyers, in June 2006, and that it was therefore very likely that the news would soon be made public. He therefore called for a prompt intervention by the Holy See.
In writing up a memo on these documents that were entrusted to me, as Delegate for Pontifical Representations, on December 6, 2006, I wrote to my superiors, Cardinal Tarcisio Bertone and the Substitute Leonardo Sandri, that the facts attributed to McCarrick by Littleton were of such gravity and vileness as to provoke bewilderment, a sense of disgust, deep sorrow and bitterness in the reader, and that they constituted the crimes of seducing, requesting depraved acts of seminarians and priests, repeatedly and simultaneously with several people, derision of a young seminarian who tried to resist the Archbishop’s seductions in the presence of two other priests, absolution of the accomplices in these depraved acts, sacrilegious celebration of the Eucharist with the same priests after committing such acts. In my memo, which I delivered on that same December 6, 2006 to my direct superior, the Substitute Leonardo Sandri, I proposed the following considerations and course of action to my superiors: Given that it seemed a new scandal of particular gravity, as it regarded a cardinal, was going to be added to the many scandals for the Church in the United States, and that, since this matter had to do with a cardinal, and according to can. 1405 § 1, No. 2 ipsius Romani Pontificis dumtaxat ius est iudicandi, I proposed that an exemplary measure be taken against the Cardinal that could have a medicinal function, to prevent future abuses against innocent victims and alleviate the very serious scandal for the faithful, who despite everything continued to love and believe in the Church. I added that it would be salutary if, for once, ecclesiastical authority would intervene before the civil authorities and, if possible, before the scandal had broken out in the press. This could have restored some dignity to a Church so sorely tried and humiliated by so many abominable acts on the part of some pastors. If this were done, the civil authority would no longer have to judge a cardinal, but a pastor with whom the Church had already taken appropriate measures to prevent the cardinal from abusing his authority and continuing to destroy innocent victims.
All the memos, letters and other documentation mentioned here are available at the Secretariat of State of the Holy See or at the Apostolic Nunciature in Washington, D.C.
My memo of December 6, 2006 was kept by my superiors, and was never returned to me with any actual decision by the superiors on this matter. Subsequently, around April 21-23, 2008, the Statement for Pope Benedict XVI about the pattern of sexual abuse crisis in the United States , by Richard Sipe, was published on the internet, at richardsipe.com. On April 24, it was passed on by the Prefect of the Congregation for the Doctrine of the Faith, Cardinal William Levada, to the Cardinal Secretary of State Tarcisio Bertone. It was delivered to me one month later, on May 24, 2008. The following day, I delivered a new memo to the new Substitute, Fernando Filoni, which included my previous one of December 6, 2006. In it, I summarized Richard Sipe ’s document, which ended with this respectful and heartfelt appeal to Pope Benedict XVI:
“I approach Your Holiness with due reverence, but with the same intensity that motivated Peter Damian to lay out before your predecessor, Pope Leo IX, a description of the condition of the clergy during his time. The problems he spoke of are similar and as great now in the United States as they were then in Rome. If Your Holiness requests, I will personally submit to you documentation of that about which I have spoken.”
I ended my memo by repeating to my superiors that I thought it was necessary to intervene as soon as possible by removing the cardinal’s hat from Cardinal McCarrick and that he should be subjected to the sanctions established by the Code of Canon Law, which also provide for reduction to the lay state. This second memo of mine was also never returned to the Personnel Office, and I was greatly dismayed at my superiors for the inconceivable absence of any measure against the Cardinal, and for the continuing lack of any communication with me since my first memo in December 2006. But finally I learned with certainty, through Cardinal Giovanni Battista Re, then-Prefect of the Congregation for Bishops, that Richard Sipe’s courageous and meritorious Statement had had the desired result.
Pope Benedict had imposed on Cardinal McCarrick sanctions similar to those now imposed on him by Pope Francis: the Cardinal was to leave the seminary where he was living, he was forbidden to celebrate [Mass] in public, to participate in public meetings, to give lectures, to travel, with the obligation of dedicating himself to a life of prayer and penance.
I do not know when Pope Benedict took these measures against McCarrick, whether in 2009 or 2010, because in the meantime I had been transferred to the Governorate of Vatican City State, just as I do not know who was responsible for this incredible delay.
I certainly do not believe it was Pope Benedict, who as Cardinal had repeatedly denounced the corruption present in the Church, and in the first months of his pontificate had already taken a firm stand against the admission into seminary of young men with deep homosexual tendencies.
I believe it was due to the Pope’s first collaborator at the time, Cardinal Tarcisio Bertone, who notoriously favored promoting homosexuals into positions of responsibility, and was accustomed to managing the information he thought appropriate to convey to the Pope. In any case, what is certain is that Pope Benedict imposed the above canonical sanctions on McCarrick and that they were communicated to him by the Apostolic Nuncio to the United States, Pietro Sambi.
Monsignor Jean-François Lantheaume, then first Counsellor of the Nunciature in Washington and Chargé d'Affaires a.i. after the unexpected death of Nuncio Sambi in Baltimore, told me when I arrived in Washington and he is ready to testify to it about a stormy conversation, lasting over an hour, that Nuncio Sambi had with Cardinal McCarrick whom he had summoned to the Nunciature. Monsignor Lantheaume told me that “the Nuncio’s voice could be heard all the way out in the corridor.”
I cannot thank you enough for taking the time to post this.The current Pope has always seemed ‘off” to me and I was right.I also never understood why Pope Benedict stepped aside.Now I understand somewhat.Thank you.
You are exactly right. We must pray that they have the grace of repentance before they breathe their last.
Bigger. Global. Much bigger.
Well I don’t, not at all.
What possible pressure could be brought to bear on a sitting conservative (relative) pope that would cause him to cut and run?
Only if a massive weeding out occurs. It must go way beyond Comrade Francis if this is to really mean anything.
Pray for Benedict XVI. He's 91 but he's still got a good mind and his heart is still beating. I have my own hypothesis of how they forced him out, and if they did what I think they did (head meds via the ex-KGB: I saw what I think is post-hypnotic suggestion in action, but of course I don't know anything), B16's abdication was invalid and he is still Pope, ad maiorem Dei gloria.
I think He is coming to the rescue. The filthy pervs are not going to get away with it.
I think-- I hope --- what we are seeing here is the beginning of the end for the men who tried to rape Christ's own Bride.
From your keybooard to God’s monitor screen.
Pray your correct.
Holy Mary mother of God pray for us!
I don't know this for a fact (I am no way a clinical psychologist, and neither am I, by temperament, a tinfoil-hat type) but I saw what I suspect may have been one, perhaps two instances of post-hypnotic suggestion applied by Georg Ganswein on B16 after his abdication.
May God protect our good Father Benedict. Frail and he is, and 91, he may yet stand up and, by God's grace, destroy the enemies of Our Lord, the violators of the Church, His Bride.
It goes way beyond Bergoglio alone. The wolves are within the gates.
I’m heartbroken for my Catholic friends, several of whom I’ve communicated with this morning. I pray for the faithful.
I pray that evil is exposed, in all institutions, holy and secular and that we are given courage to stand against it, no matter where...
It’s not just the “lavender mafia” that’s at stake here, but the entire Western post-1969 understanding of homosexuality.
The lavender mafia of the Roman Catholic Church have been instrumental in spreading and teaching the “brown eyes, blue eyes” model (for their own benefit), but this heresy has now spread far and wide, beyond the limits of the Roman confession.
What times we live in! The heresy will die, or the church will die. That’s the meaning of this remarkable eleven page “testimony” by Abp. Vigano.
Martin, Cupich, McElroy, Farrell, maybe even Francis have staked EVERYTHING on their play, which is now threatened as never before.
HOW HORRIBLE IS THAT? THAT IS REFORM?
Bookmark
You are right. The whole politically correct narrative which over the last forty years has attempted to discard the collective wisdom of three millennium regarding homosexuality, is at risk if this Pope is forced to resign. He won’t go easily or willingly. If loyal Churchmen have dirt on him, it will have to get messy to get him out. The “who am I to judge” Pope will posture that he is beyond being judged. It will get ugly. However much is at stake and people will need to prepare themselves for a very unpleasant time.
I suppose he'll have to walk around in a bubble to prevent contact?
I've heard that in some places with Fathers who are really fatherly, priests are insulted in the streets.
But it is happening...It ought to be getting clear to some of you that Jesus wasn't speaking of the Catholic Church...
According to the letter, there's not a Catholic clergy in existence who is not aware of this mass perversion taking place within your religion...Yet they keep silent...They are all condoning this lurid behavior...
Just since the news in Philadelphia broke 400 more victims have come forth in that area alone...
The church of Jesus Christ; the Body of Christ has no tares within its ranks...Neither the Catholic Church nor any Protestant church is the Body of Christ, the church of God...
What you are not seeing is this mass perversion is OK with the World...Your next pope may be a muzlim, or a crossdresser transgender and the tares of the world which are embedded in your Church and every church will love it...
This is what Jesus says about it:
2Co 6:14 Be ye not unequally yoked together with unbelievers: for what fellowship hath righteousness with unrighteousness? and what communion hath light with darkness?
2Co 6:15 And what concord hath Christ with Belial? or what part hath he that believeth with an infidel?
2Co 6:16 And what agreement hath the temple of God with idols? for ye are the temple of the living God; as God hath said, I will dwell in them, and walk in them; and I will be their God, and they shall be my people.
2Co 6:17 Wherefore come out from among them, and be ye separate, saith the Lord, and touch not the unclean thing; and I will receive you,
2Co 6:18 And will be a Father unto you, and ye shall be my sons and daughters, saith the Lord Almighty.
If you have pastors or priests or bishops who are part of the rotting fish Jesus tells you to come out from them, not to condone the activity hoping it will go away...
It is disgusting. However your eloquent post summarizes the real human spiritual, psychological and physical tragedies that homosexual perversion has caused and continues to cause. Imagine the harm that has been done beyond the Church.
The homosexuals know they will lose legitimacy if they lose their control of the Church. They were bitter when the Democrats lost the White House. They will fight bitterly to keep their hold on the Church
Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.