In your mind. But I am not interested in what you think.
Not now (you say) but you were interested enough to challenge what I said, which means you must interact with what challenges your response, unless you just want to engage in argument by mere assertion of Catholic teaching (as you interpret it). As if that settles the matter, based upon the the novel and unScriptural premise of ensured perpetual magisterial infallibility as per Rome (and basically in primary cults).
Which comes back to the questions re the basis for assurance of Truth, but which you also seem to have no interest in actually answering, and thus we must accept your reticence, while yet parroting refuted propaganda of RC polemics. Which marginalizes the poster as unfit for either meaningful exchange or intelligent debate.
Which is what can happen outside Catholic Answers type forums, versus an open forum as this.
When you posted a question, I answered. When you post a lecture with some question marks here and there, I ignore it.