I don’t rebut clowns.
I will take that as an admission that you CAN’T rebut me and so threw an ad hominem in order to make yourself look less weak.
As I said, if it were so easy to rebut me, you would. An evidence-less insult is not a rebuttal; it’s an admission that you’re the clown and don’t want to admit it.
I find it funny that you quoted St. Paul who says that we are saved by grace through faith and NOT by works in order to claim that we ARE saved by works.
Judged by works? Sure. Works are the proof of faith, so naturally you’d be judged by them. But Rome’s anti-Apostle claim is that you are saved by works; read your own catechism and learn. That stupid idea of the treasury of merits is still a thing with the Vatican.
From your posts though, sounds to me like you’re a lot closer to Luther in matters of justification than you are Roman Catholic.