What nobody here that dismisses Q will address are two things.
One, Trump tweeted a photo of his staff, wit the filename “doitQ.jpg” Trump named that photo when he tweeted it.
Two, the firetruck that was numbered Q76 with the President at the receipt of the North Korean Hostages, right after Q’s post 76, which was an inspirational, here-we-go post.
Third, signs were being taken from most of Trump’s rallies, until the recent one where Q signs were allowed, and Trump would point to the people holding them and give a fist pump.
No doubt there is a lot of mist and fog around the Q phenomenon. I have no idea if there is going to be a massive housecleaning like they say, though 45,000 sealed indictments in seven months, when the norm is 1200 does have my curiosity piqued. As does the fact Q called peace with North Korea as a done deal, back when Trump was insulting Kim on twitter.
But regardless of the story Q tells, or what he says, he is undoubtedly coming out of the Trump administration, apparently with the knowledge and support of Trump. What the purpose is, I have no idea.
It is possible many of the famous faces we know in politics are going to get smoked for treason, and this is to prepare the nation for the shock. God knows there are those out there who have it coming.
Maybe Trump is just opening a channel to tell supporters things which will poison them against the system which is fighting him.
Maybe it is all a Deep State manipulation to keep us content, hoping something is going to be done as the nation falls to some evil cabal. We know it has been going that way for a while.
But it is something. We should be trying to figure out what, rather than dismissing something which is clearly coming either from Trump, or the Deep State.
But you know that’s not the filename. It just contained the letters - and its clearly a generated filename - not a name a person/human would use. Not sure it’s even possible to give an image a particular name on twitter. But - these are the kind of coincidences that give these things wings. Especially when it gets digested down to q-advocated using misrepresentations and saying stuff like - “Trump tweeted a photo of his staff, wit the filename “doitQ.jpg” Trump named that photo when he tweeted it.” How do you help Q when you go off script like that? So many layers of assumption and story telling.