Are you playing dumb?
You interjected that my comparison was “apples to oranges”.
I stated the inaccuracy of your claim. (If you don’t know what a Non Sequitur is, try Googling.) And I demonstrated the inaccuracy of your claim with a cogent reason.
Now, if you had said “Apples to Androids,” that would be another matter.
Your replies make you sound like a bot. You are in danger of flunking the Turing Test.
Sorry, I was not wrong.
Not all products enhanced by technology makes all such products the same, nor their industries and their market forces the same.
You’d try to equate the history of cell phones with driverless cars, as if merely because technology is behind them they have the same predictable pattern as to how far they will go.
But cell phones and driverless cars are not the same, and neither are their industries and the market forces behind them.
Yours was an apples to oranges comparison.
Sometime you should examine all the cool technology that has died.