Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

To: seanmerc

“Revoking their clearances (which is what the President is considering) is much more serious.”

Not serious at all; just just. When you leave a job you leave your papers and lock the door behind. Your clearance is part of your job and belongs to your employer in a just world.


37 posted on 07/23/2018 12:20:26 PM PDT by map
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 22 | View Replies ]


To: map

In the current realm, a revocation IS much more serious than inactivation. Revocation means your clearance is removed completely, and should you require a clearance again, you would have to go through the whole process from square one. A revocation would also make it much less likely that the person would be able to pass a subsequent clearance investigation.


74 posted on 07/23/2018 12:54:25 PM PDT by seanmerc
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 37 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson