Here’s why you shouldn’t believe her:
from the story...
> “He was picking a fight. I’m just sitting, waiting for my family to come back to the car.”
> Jacobs, who was waiting in the vehicle with the couple’s two younger children — an infant and a 3-year-old — said she started feeling “scared” when she noticed how fast the argument was escalating. It wasn’t long before McGlockton came out along with their 5-year-old son and tried to diffuse the situation.
>“My man hears what’s going on, sees the guy yelling at me and I’m sitting in the car. My man is defending me and his children, so he pushes him down.
Never mind that these statements aren’t even consistent with each other.
Watch the videotape with her version of events in mind. Does a “scared” person exit the vehicle?
She makes additional statements in the news reports that are also inconsistent with the video.
In court, she’s going to get destroyed as a witness based on this evidence alone. A rookie lawyer could do it without breaking a sweat.
“Never mind that these statements aren’t even consistent with each other.”
I don’t see it the way you do, at least not as a “case closed” matter.
“Does a “scared” person exit the vehicle?”
Scared people are unpredictable. As an aside, it’s dangerous to scare some people.
“In court...”
Is where all this belongs, IMEO.