"He just kept asking, loudly and in front of other CVS staff and customers, why I was given the prescriptions," she said. A completely reasonable reaction to being prescribed a medication or substance that was anti-ethical to ones well-being.
Sounds like it was embarrassed by it's own decisions.
“He just kept asking, loudly and in front of other CVS staff and customers, why I was given the prescriptions,” she said.”
With the exception of babies born with ambiguous genitalia (an EXTREMELY rare occurrence) I am against transgenderism. HOWEVER, it is illegal for a pharmacist to discuss any issue pertaining to a prescription, within earshot of other customers or bystanders. (HIPAA -— a monstrosity, in and of itself -— but that’s another discussion, altogether). So, whether or not we agree that this person should be trying to change his/her gender, the pharmacist, by law, should have discussed the issue away from any other people. Most pharmacies “comply” with this law, by roping off a tiny area 3 or 4 feet away from the rest of the customers, which is, of course, useless.
If I, for instance, was exposed to bedbugs or lice, or Hepatitis, even if I was innocently exposed (as a nurse, for instance), or if I were a guy who needed medicine for erectile dysfunction, I would not want the pharmacist to talk about it, within earshot of others. Who would?
Most of us consider this man/woman, perverted, but the pharmacist should STILL have addressed whatever the problem was, confidentially.