[papertyger]

Your statements are ambiguous and shift to attack new strawmen rather than actually stating your beliefs and defending them.

But again, you give no example. Precisely as I predicted.

While you question (based on what misuse) my knowing the meaning of the words I use, I question your understanding the words YOU use "have meaning."

My posts 36 and 38 easily demonstrate I HAVE stated my beliefs (as if that had anything to do with refuting your own) and you have presented no objection to them.

It's no wonder the left expects their campaign of unqualified accusation to work with the likes of you floating around.

[JayGalt]

The Framers wrote The Constitution with an eye toward governing men. The Constitution they gave us is incapable of governing with its previous efficacy an electorate comprised mostly of women in that the evils to which women are prone are of a wholly different character than the evils common to men.

You have given no example. You merely say women are prone to different"evils". That is something I chose not to respond to because it is meaningless. Did God give a different set of commandments to women?