“Judge Brett Kavanaugh... forcefully defended the National Security Agency’s dragnet collection of domestic call records.”
Actually, there is not much choice when the politicians have cheerfully allowed in hundreds of thousands of questionable immigrants that enjoy plotting to destroy the Great Satan.
It was about using META DATA as a tool for surveillance of potential terrorists, not what the NSA under Obama was doing, which I believe he would oppose.
Frankly, I am more concerned about Obama and Comey unmasking political opponents to spy on them , than I am about unspecific metadata.
Swamper
I trust the President on his pick but the nominee has some uphill explaining to do with this one. He is also a big supporter of stare decisis from what I’ve heard. Stare decisis is a good concept as long as you have honest jurists to start with, otherwise it’s just a mechanism to defend the tyranny of illegitimate decisions. In our case it’s the latter.
This is one of the decisions that I have to read through for myself the next few days. It is troubling to me, to say the least, at least on the surface.
My gut instinct says no to kavanagh. His would be a swing vote.
The Constitution does NOT allow for spying on people.
Too many weird issues with this guy. I have a feeling Trump has a better one behind the curtain.
This guy needs extreme vetting - from the right.