Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

Brett Kavanaugh Poses a Serious Threat to Reproductive Rights
The Cut ^ | 07/09/2018 | By Amanda Arnold

Posted on 07/09/2018 7:14:51 PM PDT by SeekAndFind

click here to read article


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-2021-4041-53 next last
To: SeekAndFind

Isn’t it an amazing coincidence that every issue and action by Trump brings identically worded statements all over the nation by every media outlet and journalist and politician on the left? Almost like a conspiracy.Trump electors won’t vote for him in the Electoral College,Trump is mentally unfit to lead, Trump is colluding with the Russians, Trump is going to overthrow Roe v.Wade.

And spontaneous protestors arrive with professionally produced placards and banners with the same phrases. Wow.


21 posted on 07/09/2018 7:39:55 PM PDT by frank ballenger (End non-citizen voting ,vote fraud & leftist media news censorship or we're finished.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: raiderboy

Absolutely. It is unbelievable, but unfortunately true, that there are women out there who would rather kill babies than keep their legs closed. That level of sick perversion is beyond imagination.


22 posted on 07/09/2018 7:40:07 PM PDT by sipow
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 8 | View Replies]

To: SeekAndFind

This argument is losing... because “Roe” no longer has any effect. No state will go too far to limit abortions because women voters just won’t let them.

Of course the abortion indistry lobbyists are concerned that profits will suffer, and they will.


23 posted on 07/09/2018 7:40:15 PM PDT by mrsmith (Dumb sluts: Lifeblood of the Media, Backbone of the Democrat/RINO Party!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: SeekAndFind

NONSENSE

The issue will be "personhood."


24 posted on 07/09/2018 7:41:02 PM PDT by onyx (JOIN 300 CLUB BY DONATING $34 MONTHLY! TRUMP'S WAY IS THE WIINNING WAY)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: SeekAndFind

To killing pre-born children. People still get to decide whether to try to reproduce or not.


25 posted on 07/09/2018 7:49:36 PM PDT by Trumpisourlastchance
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: SeekAndFind

All of that shows that I was right when I recommended against him before today’s announcement.

May the next nominee be pro-life.

Protecting innocent little preborn babies is the most important thing that the Supreme Court Justices can endorse, and to do so they need to fully overturn Roe, Casey, and all other pro-abortion decisions, not just agree to some paltry restrictions.


26 posted on 07/09/2018 7:50:04 PM PDT by Architect of Avalon
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 9 | View Replies]

To: mrsmith

State legislators should not kneel before women voters who claim a right to murder babies between conception and birth.


27 posted on 07/09/2018 7:52:41 PM PDT by Architect of Avalon
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 23 | View Replies]

To: sipow

Feminist women impugn men in the ugliest terms and yet refuse to stay off of men.


28 posted on 07/09/2018 7:54:00 PM PDT by Architect of Avalon
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 22 | View Replies]

To: Truthoverpower

Have you seen video of the “grassroots” protest they had? Literally everyone came up the podium, ore-printed signs in hand, and screamed into the mic about their outrage, while others in the crowd simultaneity screamed their outrage into a megaphone. I tried to watch it but gave up after five minutes of incomprehensible screaming and yelling.


29 posted on 07/09/2018 7:57:39 PM PDT by matt04
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 7 | View Replies]

To: Architect of Avalon

Well, “too far” isn’t well-defined.
There is evil in people. No law can change that.

I’d expect “Roe” to be replaced by a sensible 4th Amend based ruling.
One that wouldn’t just be a justification for the abortion factories’ donations to Dems.


30 posted on 07/09/2018 8:07:12 PM PDT by mrsmith (Dumb sluts: Lifeblood of the Media, Backbone of the Democrat/RINO Party!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 27 | View Replies]

To: mrsmith

Outline what you are referring to as a sensible Fourth Amendment based ruling.


31 posted on 07/09/2018 8:20:07 PM PDT by Architect of Avalon
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 30 | View Replies]

To: SeekAndFind
"Brett Kavanaugh Poses a Serious Threat to Reproductive Rights"

No, he doesn't, ladies. Reproduce as much as you like!


32 posted on 07/09/2018 8:28:50 PM PDT by familyop ("Welcome to Costco. I love you." - -Costco greeter in the movie, "Idiocracy")
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: SeekAndFind
OMG it's happening!!!!
33 posted on 07/09/2018 8:41:46 PM PDT by EdnaMode
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: SeekAndFind

**Soon after President Donald Trump won the 2016 presidential election, he made a vow to fill the Supreme Court with “pro-life” judges — a promise that he kept when he announced Monday night that his SCOTUS pick was George W. Bush–appointed judge Brett Kavanaugh of the DC Circuit Court of Appeals.**

Says it all right there.


34 posted on 07/09/2018 8:52:49 PM PDT by Salvation ("With God all things are possible." Matthew 19:26)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: SeekAndFind

Abortion. It must have started out being ‘getting rid/killing of a fetus’. I think that is how they described it back when. Women were, suppedly too naive and ignorant to know it was a baby.. it was a “fetus”, and it was okay to kill a fetus before it became a baby.

It’s been a long and profitable climb from then to now. They claim they do good work at the abortion clinics.. breast exams, etc. and it was given a pass, using that logic and that lie. It is... and it was... a baby killing practice.

We know they went from killing, to dismemberment and cutting parts and pieces from that “fetus” (baby) and making a fortune in selling those parts and pieces. They went from killing the baby in the first 3 months, to 6 months, to kiling it after it is born alive. The depravity they have stooped to!

I can hardly type that paragraph above.. it is beyond belief that women... mothers to be.. stand for killing the most innocent of all creatures.. a human baby.

They are on TV tonight, showing their most ugly side of humanity.. shouting and going beserk over their “right” to kill a human being, too small and innocent to defend itself. The thought of what they are yelling and demanding, sends chills throughout our country, as to what these women are standing for and demanding... they turn into monsters, desiring to kill at random, a baby. They would sooner save a dog left out in the heat, than to save a human life that got in their way!


35 posted on 07/09/2018 9:10:37 PM PDT by frnewsjunkie
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Carl Vehse

It’s not “Reproductive rights”; it’s genocidal murder, crimes against humanity and destructive to those getting an abortion with a time delayed internal bomb of depression, which will go off.


36 posted on 07/09/2018 9:17:30 PM PDT by Grampa Dave (Trump: "Families of American citizens murdered by illegals are permanently separated from them!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 4 | View Replies]

To: Architect of Avalon

Sorry. Don’t have the legal knowledge to do so. A sensible decision would not be based on ‘penumbras’ of the Fourth.

After ‘Roe’ abortion will be a political question. Until the Second Coming I expect it to be allowed. People are just not that good.


37 posted on 07/09/2018 9:21:37 PM PDT by mrsmith (Dumb sluts: Lifeblood of the Media, Backbone of the Democrat/RINO Party!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 31 | View Replies]

To: Vendome
Ironic, because killing something does not reproduce anything...

It would be like the Nazis calling concentration camps government housing with free utilities including showers.

38 posted on 07/09/2018 9:33:16 PM PDT by shanover (...To disarm the people is the best and most effectual way to enslave them.-S.Adams)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2 | View Replies]

To: Vendome

Non-reproductive non-rights.


39 posted on 07/09/2018 11:39:31 PM PDT by YogicCowboy ("I am not entirely on anyone's side, because no one is entirely on mine." - J. R. R. Tolkien)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2 | View Replies]

To: Architect of Avalon

PMFJI, but I think what we’re getting at belongs in the “Judicial Overreach” category. When the Supreme Court did what it did in Roe, it short-circuited the political debate.

Bear in mind the time and context of the decision. The ERA was on the table. Nixon had created significant big state agencies such as EPA, and the Department of Energy was not far behind. Earl Warren was no longer Chief Justice. The Burger court held the concept of federal courts acting when the state legislatures wouldn’t.

IANAL. I believe, even still, Roe represented a wave of judicial thinking that crested. As the justices realized what that decision had done to the nation, and conservatives began to make the case judges were inventing laws where none existed, the pendulum started swinging back. Where it stops...


40 posted on 07/10/2018 1:52:02 AM PDT by Sam_Damon
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 31 | View Replies]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-2021-4041-53 next last

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson