If NeverTrumper David French thinks Kavanaugh is good, Trump should reconsider !
and reportedly squashed the vince foster investigation if the following is true:
[[Who chose Kavanaugh to put the Foster investigation to bed?
Ken Starr.
Who knew what Kavanaugh was going to do?
Ken Starr.]]
http://www.wnd.com/2017/11/no-ken-starr-was-not-right/
If Kavanaugh was closer than 30 miles from any reported sexual assault or rape in his entire lifetime he’s toast.
Crystal’s pick to run against Trump. Profound wisdom from a never trumper. Hogwash.
And Kennedy got both of those right.
It’s a conspiracy, I tell ya! Reptilians! Shape-shifters! Misogynistic robots! The Patriarchy!
To save the remaining time on his term, preserve Republican control of Congress and place himself in the best position to win the 2020 presidential election, President Trump should nominate Judge Amy Coney Barrett of the 7th U.S. Circuit Court of Appeals to fill the opening on the U.S. Supreme Court. | Fox News
Sent from my iPad
The growing buzz on Kavanaugh and Barrett tell me Trump has someone else in mind. It’d be a great tactic, steering the libs and their media toward these two while he preps someone completely different. My money is on Thapur.
Can’t these people wait just two more days until Trump makes the announcement?
I’ve seen several articles this week, speculating who the SCOTUS pick will be...they need to just chill?
Are they just trying to “scoop” each other, or get started early on the candidate-bashing...or both?
It’s the weekend, go to the lake, go shopping, do something, but quit obsessing over Trump’s pick, because you’re not going to think of any digs today that you won’t think of on Monday.
Jeeeeeeeshhh.
Trump’s choice may not be my preferred pick but I will defer to his judgment. His insight and strategies are superior to mine and to probably everyone else’s on FR or anywhere else, anyone who is in any position to make these choices or influence them.
https://www.nationalreview.com/bench-memos/judge-kavanaughs-record-on-religious-liberty/
Kavanaugh soundly determined that the HHS mandate regulations “substantially burden the religious organizations’ exercise of religion because the regulations require the organizations to take an action contrary to their sincere religious beliefs (submitting the form) or else pay significant monetary penalties.”
David French supporting Kavanaugh is yet another reason for conservatives to object to Kavanaugh.
French is as vile a Never Trumper as there is.
But he is actually pathetic in this article. Kavanaugh has a lengthy judicial record. Many of the others don’t. He may have erred in those two cases, but how many errors would the others have made? And, what other best options among the similarly experienced are there?
Hard to make a case that Kavanaugh isn’t the best choice based on these two presumed flaws—when French either can’t or doesn’t bother to present the specifics of whom he thinks a better alternative.