[SoConPubbie]

Free traitors, feminists and anti-Second-Amendment activists will do anything to try to stop a good appointment to the Supreme Court.

I hope you aren't talking about the freepers that are trying to get at the truth about all the nominees.

If you are, you need to dial back the rhetoric.

[familyop]

Logical information with references is good in regards any of the possible appointees.

[familyop]

I’m going to clarify that issue with a quote and reference. Need a few minutes here.

[familyop]

Here's one of the conspiracy theories.

There is something 'fishy' about one of Trump's potential Supreme Court nominees
American Thinker
By Allan J. Favish
June 28, 2018

Before Trump makes his decision, he should speak with Miguel Rodriguez,...Kavanaugh may have a record of judicial opinions demonstrating fidelity to the rule of law, the relevant facts, and the United States Constitution. But that is only his judicial opinions...Rodriguez went back to the U.S. attorney's office in Sacramento, where, following a gender identity change,...

Do you have any idea how offensive that kind of treachery against conservatives is to conservatives who don't live near the coasts? Kavanaugh was said to have led the investigation, but so was Rodriguez.

Association alone should not be used to imply guilt. There's not even any specific accusation that Kavanaugh did something wrong. Instead, guilt is simply implied repeatedly with fallacies.

And what motive would someone have for calling Kavanaugh's great record "only his judicial opinions?"

Vince Foster's death has been investigated five times. Records reveal evidence from the investigations, and others are claiming that the evidence is falsified.

Enough! Anyone using a tragedy caused in part by the Clinton Administration's toxic work environment to dishonestly implicate conservatives with nothing more than associations and implications is not helping conservatives.

And I really don't care about popularity contests and cults of personality. Such activities are also antithetical to conservatism and should be relegated to the hen house. I care about the facts, and only as logically presented. All else is lying, which is suspect.

[familyop]

Also see the furtive fallacy, one of many used by narcissists in conspiracy theories against the reputations of people like Kavanaugh. Kavanaugh did quite well with conservative work in support of our Constitution for a man in the middle of the Washington D.C. population, but some who push conspiracy tales also libeled him by associating him with those who worked around him and for him.

Many of us have been on the receiving end of slanders from affirmative action employees in our jobs and other situations and have had more than our fill of it. Men and traditional families don’t like seeing truly conservative possible Supreme Court nominees being dishonestly defamed, because that may lead to more decades of poor judicial treatment for us.

And the motive and preference behind the defamation has been made obvious to us. Enough feminism and social leftism against our constitutional rights. We won’t put up with it any more.

[familyop]

"If you are, you need to dial back the rhetoric."

Thank you. That's a good personal direction in general--one that I had forgotten after some years away from writing. Going back to writing for a publication and avoiding discussions about articles might be a better way to go.