I’ll give him that one and in fact, he sides with law Enforcement in Carpenter. Not an unusual ruling. It was in keeping with precedent at the time.
The SCOTUS ruling.... “was very narrow and did not otherwise change the third-party doctrine related to other business records that might incidentally reveal location information, nor overruled prior decisions concerning conventional surveillance techniques and tools such as security cameras.
The Court did not expand its ruling on other matters related to cellphones not presented in Carpenter, including real-time cell site location information (CSLI) or “tower dumps” (a download of information about all the devices that connected to a particular cell site during a particular interval).
https://www.google.com/amp/amp.dailycaller.com/2018/07/03/kethledge-rising-scotus/#spf=1530710230503
:)
Agreed on your comment #39, too. Thank you.