Completely agree with you.
And this is REALLY going to set off some cannons. I don’t believe that women should be “authority-less.” Man was designed to be the woman’s covering authority, and “liberated” women (deliberately) without men are just strange, designless freaks which spiral into all kinds of error. I’m not saying that incidental alone-ness does this. A father or other male household member can fill that role. I’m saying that as far as being leaders in a moral society, men are at the apex of that role by design.
All that being said, there are horribly leftist men, and relatively conservative women. All else being equal, a man should be selected to lead. If the unconscionable choice between a loony leftist man and a sensible conservative woman were to be my only options, I’d pick the woman.
Okay, flame away.
You’ve been reading too much Bill Gothard!
I have three female friends, all unmarried, none of whom are “covered under a man’s authority,” and they are decent, gracious, smart, successful and conservative, with common sense, and I’d take them as a Supreme Court judge any day over some benighted loon who’s been emasculated by our sodden culture.
Maybe that “covered by a man’s authority” stuff made sense in the ‘50’s, but not now...
Ed