[So it is impossible to do this but it is still law. Sounds like typical California logic.]
This is called a “technical ban”. Require a technology that is grossly impractical or not possible and you have a defacto handgun ban. Either way it yields the desired outcome of the anti-gunners.
SCOTUS has already ruled that a partial infringement is still an infringement. This law is unconstitutional but will require someone that has standing to fight it.
Exactly. They can’t ban guns so they will just make them horribly expensive and impossible to manufacture.