Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

To: Svartalfiar

That was an insurrection which the federal government is EXPLICITLY empowered to repress insurrections in the Constitution. See Article 1, Section 10, paragraph 3 and tell me what that says


129 posted on 06/25/2018 5:09:21 PM PDT by arrogantsob (See "Chaos and Mayhem" at Amazon.com)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 85 | View Replies ]


To: arrogantsob

No state shall keep troops or ships or enter into external compacts?

I think you mean Section 8, paragraph a bunch, about calling forth the militia to prevent insurrection? The issue here is that it’s not an insurrection - that’s when a small group is rebelling against the legitimate authority. What actually happened was that that same legitimate authority (the state) no longer recognized a higher authority (FedGov) it ceded some powers to. It simply revoked giving those powers to the US, and instead reclaimed them for the state / ceded them then to the Confederacy.


257 posted on 06/25/2018 8:38:38 PM PDT by Svartalfiar
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 129 | View Replies ]

To: arrogantsob
It was *CALLED* an insurrection precisely because that releases the power they wished to use to stop it. Secession was in fact a very ordered and valid democratic process.

But deliberately lying about the meaning of words has long been a liberal tactic.

321 posted on 06/25/2018 11:09:42 PM PDT by DiogenesLamp ("of parents owing allegiance to no other sovereignty.")
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 129 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson